Vicarious Learning from the Failures and Near-Failures of Others: Evidence from the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry
Abstract
We examine whether organizations vicariously learn from near-failures and failures of others. We propose that the impact of such failure-related experience depends on the geographic market and industry origin of the experience. Our findings indicate that the local failure-related experience of both banks and thrifts have higher survival-enhancing learning value for banks than nonlocal experience, supporting the value of accessibility and applicability for useful learning. Bank near-failure experience had more value than bank failure experience, but thrift failure and near-failure experience had equivalent impact, suggesting that the learning impact of types of failure-related experience varies with its industry origin.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organizations can learn from the vicariously experienced incidents from related or similar organizations.
“Furthermore, organizations can learn from the vicariously experienced incidents from related or similar organizations (Kim and Miner 2007;Madsen 2009).”
From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Kim and Miner 2007
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · see citing works
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903 · see citing works
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499 · see citing works
Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490248 · Cited by 3,967 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization
Duchek, S. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 · Cited by 2,027 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, J.-Y. (., & Miner, A. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 687-714
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2024036883
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 22.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- observational learning, organizational learning, bank failures, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, bank survival, geographic market
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review