Cited by 443Banking stability, regulation, efficiencyInnovation and Knowledge ManagementManagement and Organizational Studies

Vicarious Learning from the Failures and Near-Failures of Others: Evidence from the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry

Kim, Ji-Yub (Jay), Miner, Anne S.·2007·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

We examine whether organizations vicariously learn from near-failures and failures of others. We propose that the impact of such failure-related experience depends on the geographic market and industry origin of the experience. Our findings indicate that the local failure-related experience of both banks and thrifts have higher survival-enhancing learning value for banks than nonlocal experience, supporting the value of accessibility and applicability for useful learning. Bank near-failure experience had more value than bank failure experience, but thrift failure and near-failure experience had equivalent impact, suggesting that the learning impact of types of failure-related experience varies with its industry origin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2007.25529755

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Organizations can learn from the vicariously experienced incidents from related or similar organizations.

    “Furthermore, organizations can learn from the vicariously experienced incidents from related or similar organizations (Kim and Miner 2007;Madsen 2009).”

    From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Kim and Miner 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J.-Y. (., & Miner, A. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2007-06
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
687-714
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2024036883
Cited by
443
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 24
FWCI
22.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
observational learning, organizational learning, bank failures, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, bank survival, geographic market

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review