The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Conflict Asymmetry on Work Group and Individual Outcomes
Abstract
We examine the consequences of an often ignored aspect of work group conflict—asymmetric conflict perceptions—for the effectiveness of individuals and groups. Tests of our multilevel hypotheses using data on 51 work groups showed that group conflict asymmetry (the degree to which members differ in perceptions of the level of conflict in their group) decreased performance and creativity in groups. In addition, individual conflict asymmetry (a member perceiving more or less conflict than other group members) explained reported performance and satisfaction with a group. Social processes and a positive group atmosphere mediated this effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,281
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,724
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 10,899
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings
Shrout, P. E. (1980) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(80)90063-4 · Cited by 6,010
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,339
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000) · Cited by 4,914
Cited by
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103
Group Faultlines: A Review, Integration, and Guide to Future Research
Thatcher, S. M. B., & Patel, P. C. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311426187 · Cited by 391
Self-citationConceptualizing Emergent States: A Strategy to Advance the Study of Group Dynamics
Waller, M. J., Okhuysen, G. A., & Saghafian, M. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1120958 · Cited by 143
Zhao, E. Y., Thatcher, S. M. B., & Jehn, K. A. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0153 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. B.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 596-616
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W1986145148
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 150
- FWCI
- 53.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Conflict Asymmetry on Work Group and Individual Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amj.2010.51468978
- The paper
- Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2010). The Effects of Conflict Asymmetry on Work Group and Individual Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468978
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
