The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams
Open accessAbstract
This study integrates theories from the leadership and team development literatures to resolve ambiguity regarding the relative benefits of empowering and directive leadership in teams by focusing on their influence on team development processes over time. Empirical results based on longitudinal performance data from 60 teams suggest that teams led by a directive leader initially outperform those led by an empowering leader. However, despite lower early performance, teams led by an empowering leader experience higher performance improvement over time because of higher levels of team learning, coordination, empowerment, and mental model development. Implications for current and future team leadership research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,235
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422 · Cited by 11,335
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 10,899
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170701341316 · Cited by 9,973
PSYCHOLOGICAL, EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT AND VALIDATION.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256865 · Cited by 7,383
(2013) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr · Cited by 6,716
Leadership : Theory and Practice
Northouse, P. G. (2015) · Cited by 6,488
YUKL, G. A. (1981) · Cited by 5,266
Cited by
Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0660 · Cited by 531
Barnes, C. M., Lucianetti, L., Bhave, D. P., & Christian, M. S. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.1063 · Cited by 441
Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0113 · Cited by 417
Schwarzmüller, T., Brosi, P., Duman, D., & Welpe, I. M. (2018) · management revu · doi:10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-114 · Cited by 409
Sharma, P. N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2015) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601115574906 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorinkova, N. M., Pearsall, M. J., & Sims, H. P.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 573-596
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2126764379
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 22.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amj.2011.0132
- The paper
- Lorinkova, N. M., Pearsall, M. J., & Sims, H. P. (2013). Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
