Tolerance: A Neglected Dimension in Diversity Training?
Open accessAbstract
To reduce discrimination and achieve a sustainable integration of an increasingly diverse workforce, organizations invest considerable time and money into diversity training. Despite these efforts, corporate diversity training oftentimes is not effective, as it does not sufficiently enable training participants to constructively deal with diversity. We specify the underlying barriers to learning that may cause diversity training to fail: The trainees’ tendency to keep quiet about their thoughts or to voice them in a dogmatic manner, which is likely to lead to latent or manifest conflicts, hindering learning. We also show why the currently dominant diversity-training models—labeled according to their objectives as “equal opportunities,” “integrating minorities,” and “inclusion via ‘me’ within ‘we’”—do not suffice to overcome these barriers to learning, largely due to dysfunctional beliefs of the trainers, as these shape learning processes, and thus, training success. Proposing that tolerance acts as a vehicle to overcoming the barriers to learning in diversity training, we introduce a training model focused on fostering tolerance and sustained by tolerance-supportive trainer beliefs. We discuss training measures that could aid the development of tolerance in trainees, limitations of our tolerance-centered diversity training, and venues for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such diversity training may increase exclusion rather than inclusion.
“and may increase exclusion rather than inclusion (Gebert, Buengeler, & Heinitz, 2017).”
From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Gebert, Buengeler, & Heinitz, 2017
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631 · see citing works
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160 · Cited by 2,356 · see citing works
The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development
Kegan, R. (1982) · doi:10.4159/9780674039414 · Cited by 1,920 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000482 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gebert, D., Buengeler, C., & Heinitz, K.
- Affiliations
- Tongji University (CN)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Learning & Education
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 415-438
- ISSN
- 1537-260X (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9585
- OpenAlex
- W2541747962
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 5.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- handle.uba.uva.nl
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Academy of Management Learning and Education (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Keywords
- tolerance, diversity training, barriers to learning, equal opportunities, inclusion, workplace diversity, organizational integration, training effectiveness, dysfunctional attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review