The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Codesigning Meaningful Engagement with Online Course Readings: Implications for Teaching Management Courses
Abstract
This paper reconceptualizes student engagement with course readings in management education. We challenge the perception of assigned readings as a solely student-centered issue, and propose a codesign approach that emphasizes the relational and intersubjective nature of various stakeholders contributing to the engagement design. The paper extends prior research by identifying concepts of quality of participation, connecting practices, and digital engagement that impact meaningful engagement with course readings. Grounded in action research theory, we propose a framework to design meaningful student engagement that is structured around six dimensions: (1) usefulness, (2) enjoyment, (3) quantity, (4) access, (5) intent, and (6) participative integration. These dimensions are entangled and viewed through three lenses: (a) what, (b) how, and (c) why. This paper presents theoretical and practical contributions, and importantly offers a paradigm shift in how educators and educational developers can enhance engagement with course readings in management education and beyond.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This advances educational technology scholarship by providing empirical evidence that generative AI integration need not compromise active learning principles when structured as pedagogical partnerships”
From Pedagogical partnerships with generative AI in higher education: how dual cognitive pathways paradoxically enable transformative learning (2026) · cites this paper as Zeivots & Shalavin, 2024
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 10
Research works printed but not linked: 91
- Abbott R., 2013, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50, 191, 10.1080/14703297.2012.760865 · DOI
- Baker S., 2019, Higher Education Research & Development, 38, 142, 10.1080/07294360.2018.1540554 · DOI
- 10.5465/amle.2021.0305 · DOI
- Beatty J. E., 2020, Journal of Management Education, 44, 533
- Beetham H., 2019, Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age, 32, 10.4324/9781351252805-3 · DOI
- Berry T., 2011, College Teaching, 59, 31, 10.1080/87567555.2010.509376 · DOI
- Beth A. D., 2015, Interactive Learning Environments, 23, 471, 10.1080/10494820.2013.788035 · DOI
- Bharuthram S., 2015, South African Journal of Higher Education, 29, 42
- Bhavsar V. M., 2020, College Teaching, 68, 33, 10.1080/87567555.2019.1696740 · DOI
- Biesta G. J., 2013, The beautiful risk of education.
- Bonnel W., 2018, Teaching with technologies in nursing and the health professions: Strategies for engagement, quality, and safety, 10.1891/9780826142924 · DOI
- Bosley L., 2008, Literacy Research and Instruction, 47, 285, 10.1080/19388070802332861 · DOI
- Braun K. W., 2012, Issues in Accounting Education, 27, 267, 10.2308/iace-10219 · DOI
- 10.5465/amle.2020.0072 · DOI
- 10.5465/amle.2003.9324013 · DOI
- Brown A., 2014, Journal of Management Development, 33, 603, 10.1108/JMD-04-2014-0038 · DOI
- Carvalho L., 2022, Postdigital Science and Education, 5
- Clarke V., 2015, Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, 3, 222
- Clinton V., 2019, Journal of Research in Reading, 42, 288, 10.1111/1467-9817.12269 · DOI
- Clump M. A., 2004, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 227
- Cochran-Smith M., 2009, The SAGE handbook of educational action research, 39, 10.4135/9780857021021.n5 · DOI
- Coghlan D., 2019, Doing action research in your own organization
- Colón-Aguirre M., 2012, Journal of Academic Leadership, 38, 391
- Costa C., 2018, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 140, 10.14742/ajet.3979 · DOI
- Coughlan P., 2002, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22, 220, 10.1108/01443570210417515 · DOI
- Dallimore E. J., 2004, Communication Education, 53, 103, 10.1080/0363452032000135805 · DOI
- Davis C. H., 2004, Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 287
- Deale C. S., 2022, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 34, 45, 10.1080/10963758.2020.1868317 · DOI
- Dewey J., 1916, Democracy and education. An introduction to the philosophy of education.
- Donovan P., 2017, Journal of Management Education, 41, 835
- Errington A., 2015, Journal of Management Education, 39, 774
- Fawns T., 2021, Online postgraduate education in a postdigital world: Beyond technology., 10.1007/978-3-030-77673-2 · DOI
- Freire P., 2005, Literacy: Reading the word and the world., 10.4324/9780203986103 · DOI
- 2017, Educational Action Research, 25, 3, 10.1080/09650792.2015.1124046 · DOI
- Greenwood D. J., 2012, Action Research, 10, 115, 10.1177/1476750312443573 · DOI
- Habermas J., 1985, The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason, 2
- Hammond M., 2000, Computers & Education, 35, 251, 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00037-3 · DOI
- Hibbert P., 2015, Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 177, 10.1007/s10551-013-1993-7 · DOI
- Hill L., 2015, Teaching in Higher Education, 20, 845, 10.1080/13562517.2015.1095178 · DOI
- Hoeft M. E., 2012, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6, 1, 10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060212 · DOI
- Hrastinski S., 2009, Computers & Education, 52, 78, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009 · DOI
- Hsiao J. C., 2023, Interactive Learning Environments, 1
- Hughes H., 2013, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37, 126, 10.1080/0309877X.2011.644778 · DOI
- Jandrić P., 2018, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50, 893, 10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000 · DOI
- Kemmis S., 2009, Educational Action Research, 17, 463, 10.1080/09650790903093284 · DOI
- Kemmis S., 2022, Action research for change and development, 57
- Kerr M. M., 2017, College Teaching, 65, 28, 10.1080/87567555.2016.1222577 · DOI
- Knight B. A., 2015, Cogent Education, 2, 1015812, 10.1080/2331186X.2015.1015812 · DOI
- Kuhn A., 2023, Higher Education Research & Development, 42, 141, 10.1080/07294360.2021.2019201 · DOI
- 10.5465/amle.2022.0035 · DOI
- Laurillard D., 2012, Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology.
- Lei S. A., 2010, College Student Journal, 44, 219
- Lundgren H., 2024, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23, 265, 10.5465/amle.2022.0004 · DOI
- Luo T., 2019, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 31
- Macgregor A., 2018, TESOL Journal, 9, 299, 10.1002/tesj.324 · DOI
- Manarin K., 2015, Critical reading in higher education: Academic goals and social engagement.
- Manarin K., 2019, Higher Education Research & Development, 38, 11, 10.1080/07294360.2018.1527296 · DOI
- Mann S. J., 2000, Higher Education, 39, 297, 10.1023/A:1003953002704 · DOI
- Margaryan A., 2011, Computers & Education, 56, 429, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004 · DOI
- Matheson R., 2018, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55, 602
- McKee R. J., 2015, Journal of Social Science Education, 14, 66
- 10.5465/amle.2018.0029 · DOI
- Murden T., 1997, Exploring literacy, 85
- Nichols M., 2020, Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 24, 121
- Oluoch P. M., 2018, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17, 17, 10.26803/ijlter.17.11.2 · DOI
- 10.5465/amle.2011.0019 · DOI
- Park S. W., 2013, TechTrends, 57, 46, 10.1007/s11528-013-0645-1 · DOI
- Phillips B. J., 2007, Issues in Accounting Education, 22, 21, 10.2308/iace.2007.22.1.21 · DOI
- Presnky M., 2001, On the Horizon, 9, 1
- Prior D. D., 2016, Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001 · DOI
- 10.5465/amle.2018.0056 · DOI
- 10.5465/amle.2010.0044 · DOI
- Revans R., 2016, Action learning in practice, 5
- Ryshina-Pankova M., 2013, Discourse 2.0: Language and new media, 183
- Salmi A., 2019, CoDesign, 17, 101, 10.1080/15710882.2019.1581817 · DOI
- Sappington J., 2002, Teaching of Psychology, 29, 272, 10.1207/S15328023TOP2904_02 · DOI
- 2022, Higher Education, 1
- 10.5465/amle.2021.0182 · DOI
- Starcher K., 2011, International Journal on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23, 396
- St Clair-Thompson H., 2018, Education inquiry, 9, 284, 10.1080/20004508.2017.1380487 · DOI
- Stokes P., 2008, Studies in Higher Education, 33, 113, 10.1080/03075070801915874 · DOI
- Venn E., 2023, Teaching in Higher Education, 28, 822, 10.1080/13562517.2020.1863349 · DOI
- Vonderwell S., 2005, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 213, 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782457 · DOI
- Wardak D., 2023, Postdigital Science and Education.
- Westerlaken M., 2019, BMC Medical Education, 19, 1, 10.1186/s12909-019-1717-5 · DOI
- Wilson K., 2016, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 256, 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.002 · DOI
- Wilson S., 2021, Handbook of teaching and learning at business schools: A practice-based approach, 20
- Winkler O. W., 2009, Interpreting economic and social data: A foundation of descriptive statistics., 10.1007/978-3-540-68721-4 · DOI
- Zeivots S., 2016, Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 56, 353
- Zeivots S., 2023, Project Management Journal, 54, 651, 10.1177/87569728231176924 · DOI
- Zeivots S., 2024, Australian Educational Researcher
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeivots, S., & Shalavin, C. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Learning & Education
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 284-303
- ISSN
- 1537-260X (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9585
- OpenAlex
- W4391470109
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Learning and Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Management and Marketing Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- student engagement, course readings, co-design, management education, online learning, quality of participation, digital engagement, intersubjectivity, educational developers, action research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Codesigning Meaningful Engagement with Online Course Readings: Implications for Teaching Management Courses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amle.2022.0364
- The paper
- Zeivots, S., & Shalavin, C. A. (2024). Codesigning Meaningful Engagement with Online Course Readings: Implications for Teaching Management Courses. Academy of Management Learning & Education. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2022.0364