The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corporate Social Responsibility: A Conceptualization Based on Organizational Literature
Abstract
Several definitions and models of the phenomenon of corporate social responsibility are reviewed. These conceptualizations and definitions are found to lack either empirical and/or theoretical support; they have not provided a basis for a clear understanding of the phenomenon. They have, in fact, led to confusion in the literature. I propose a definition of social responsibility based on the notion of a “fit” between the two components of a “business ethic” and societal expectations of the private economic sector. A typology of social responsibility which incorporates this definition, and which is based on the Blau and Scott “prime beneficiary” and the Emery and Trim “causal texture of organizational environment” typologies is also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838 · Cited by 4,659
Metadata
- Authors
- Zenisek, T. J.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1979-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 359
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042038942
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Social Responsibility: A Conceptualization Based on Organizational Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/257192
- The paper
- Zenisek, T. J. (1979). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Conceptualization Based on Organizational Literature. The Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/257192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.