Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model
Abstract
Existing theoretical models of individual ethical decision making in organizations place little or no emphasis on characteristics of the ethical issue itself. This article (a) proposes an issue-contingent model containing a new set of variables called moral intensity; (b) using concepts, theory, and evidence derived largely from social psychology, argues that moral intensity influences every component of moral decision making and behavior; (c) offers four research propositions: and (d) discusses implications of the theory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Distance from potential victims has been shown to have a positive effect on unethical professional behaviour.
“This is worrying, as distance from potential victims has been shown to have a positive effect on unethical professional behaviour.”
From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 76 · Cited by 4,135
- Authors
- Jones, T. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Thomas M.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 366
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124077410
- Cited by
- 4,135
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 144 · 2025: 159 · 2024: 164 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 214 · 2021: 203 · 2020: 198 · 2019: 197 · 2018: 177 · 2017: 177 · 2016: 215 · 2015: 197 · 2014: 191 · 2013: 189 · 2012: 228
- FWCI
- 51.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- ethical decision-making, moral intensity, moral behavior, organizational ethics, ethical considerations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review