The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking
Abstract
In contrast to content-based models of corporate social responsibility (CSR), we propose a process model of organizational sensemaking explaining how managers think, discuss, and act with respect to their key stakeholders and the world at large. We also propose a set of cognitive, linguistic, and conative dimensions to identify such an intrinsic orientation that guides CSR-related activities. Recognizing patterns of interrelationships among these dimensions might lead to a better understanding of a firm's CSR impact and generate a rich research agenda that links key organizational features to CSR character.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838 · Cited by 4,659
The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177 · Cited by 2,228
Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726703056001448 · Cited by 1,372
Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400112 · Cited by 682
Cited by
From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.684462 · Cited by 1,656
Hollebeek, L. D., & Macky, K. (2019) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.003 · Cited by 978
Lai, C.-S., Chiu, C.-J., Yang, C.-F., & Pai, D.-C. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0433-1 · Cited by 852
Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: the case of interviews with elite informants
Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3015 · Cited by 791
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508413478310 · Cited by 591
Metadata
- Authors
- Basu, K., & Palazzo, G.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122-136
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W2168338555
- Cited by
- 1,348
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 175.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amr.2008.27745504
- The paper
- Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27745504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
