The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extending the Boundaries: Reframing “Entrepreneurship as Social Change” Through Feminist Perspectives
Abstract
We engage in a critical theoretical exercise to extend the boundaries of entrepreneurship theory and research by reframing “entrepreneurship as positive economic activity” to “entrepreneurship as social change.” Reframing entrepreneurship through feminist analytical lenses, we argue that more theoretical frameworks are needed for exploring the varieties of social change that entrepreneurship may bring about. We also discuss what difference this would make in extant entrepreneurship perspectives. Theoretically, methodologically, and analytically, such reframing is the main contribution of this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development
GILLIGAN, C. (1993) · doi:10.4159/9780674037618 · Cited by 9,127
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
Men and Women of the Corporation.
Strauss, G., & Kanter, R. M. (1978) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2522922 · Cited by 7,288
(2013) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr · Cited by 6,716
Men and Women of the Corporation
Devanna, M. A. (1978) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188637801400208 · Cited by 6,354
(1984) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 6,312
The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender
Chodorow, N. (1978) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520924086 · Cited by 4,388
Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives.
Connell, R. W., & Harding, S. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075914 · Cited by 2,641
The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology.
Sprague, J., & Smith, D. E. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073155 · Cited by 2,455
Cited by
Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508412448695 · Cited by 759
Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty: A review and future research directions
Sutter, C., Bruton, G. D., & Chen, J. (2019) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.003 · Cited by 685
Empowering Women through Social Entrepreneurship: Case Study of a Women's Cooperative in India
Datta, P. B., & Gailey, R. (2012) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00505.x · Cited by 634
Marlow, S., & McAdam, M. (2013) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research · doi:10.1108/13552551311299288 · Cited by 584
A Realist Perspective of Entrepreneurship: Opportunities As Propensities
Ramoglou, S., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0281 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Calás, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 552-569
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W1964689857
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 35.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending the Boundaries: Reframing “Entrepreneurship as Social Change” Through Feminist Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amr.2009.40633597
- The paper
- Calás, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A. (2009). Extending the Boundaries: Reframing “Entrepreneurship as Social Change” Through Feminist Perspectives. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.40633597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
