The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Geography of Strain: Organizational Resilience as a Function of Intergroup Relations
Open accessAbstract
Organizational resilience is an organization’s ability to absorb strain and preserve or improve functioning, despite the presence of adversity. In existing scholarship there is the implicit assumption that organizations experience and respond holistically to acute forms of adversity. We challenge this assumption by theorizing about how adversity can create differential strain, affecting parts of an organization rather than the whole. We argue that relations among those parts fundamentally shape organizational resilience. We develop a theoretical model that maps how the differentiated emergence of strain in focal parts of an organization triggers the movements of adjoining parts to provide or withhold resources necessary for the focal parts to adapt effectively. Drawing on core principles of theories about intergroup relations, we theorize about three specific pathways—integration, disavowal, and reclamation—by which responses of adjoining parts to focal part strain shape organizational resilience. We further theorize about influences on whether and when adjoining parts are likely to select different pathways. The resulting theory reveals how the social processes among parts of organizations influence member responses to adversity and, ultimately, organizational resilience. We conclude by noting the implications for organizational resilience theory, research, and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Bonanno, G. A. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.20 · Cited by 6,851
Reason, J. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139062367 · Cited by 5,108
Organizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams
Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0134 · Cited by 1,945
Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.192960 · Cited by 1,534
Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control
Comfort, L. K. (2007) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00827.x · Cited by 940
The Organizational and Interorganizational Development of Disasters
Turner, B. A. (1976) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391850 · Cited by 876 · cited 3×
“…22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 dangerously strained capacities (Weick & Sutcliffe, 2006) rather than collectively attend to what they imply about crises that may be incubating (Turner, 1976; Williams, et. al., 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialOrganizational resilience: Towards a theory and research agenda
Vogus, T. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007) · 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2007.4414160 · Cited by 846
Explaining Compassion Organizing
Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. (2006) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.51.1.59 · Cited by 714
Cited by
Ashford, S. J., Caza, B. B., & Reid, E. M. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001 · Cited by 582
Self-citationResilience in the Workplace: A Multilevel Review and Synthesis
Hartmann, S., Weiss, M., Newman, A., & Hoegl, M. (2020) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12191 · Cited by 521
Safety II professionals: How resilience engineering can transform safety practice
Provan, D. J., Woods, D. D., Dekker, S. W. A., & Rae, A. J. (2020) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2019.106740 · Cited by 267
Desai, V. M. (2020) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2019.1292 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Kahn, W. A., Barton, M. A., Fisher, C. M., Heaphy, E. D., Reid, E. M., & Rouse, E. D.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 509-529
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W2738192884
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 13.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Geography of Strain: Organizational Resilience as a Function of Intergroup Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amr.2016.0004
- The paper
- Kahn, W. A., Barton, M. A., Fisher, C. M., Heaphy, E. D., Reid, E. M., & Rouse, E. D. (2018). The Geography of Strain: Organizational Resilience as a Function of Intergroup Relations. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.