AI and education: guidance for policy-makers
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Policies on AI in education are mostly generic and implicit because of the lack of concrete evidence of implementing AI technologies.
“Despite identifying multiple issues of concern in the educational contexts, policies on AI in education are mostly generic and implicit because of the lack of concrete evidence of implementing AI technologies (UNESCO, 2021a).”
From A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning (2023) · cites this paper as UNESCO, 2021a
The integration of AI technologies into teaching and learning began as early as the 1970s, and different forms are now used in various educational contexts.
“The integration of AI technologies into teaching and learning has begun as early as the 1970s and nowadays, different forms of these technologies are used in various educational contexts, such as the use of personalized applications for learning and assessment and information systems that help handle administrative and management tasks in schools (Al Braiki et al.,”
From A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning (2023) · cites this paper as UNESCO, 2021a
The UNESCO recommendations are intended for education in general and do not specifically cater to the needs of university teaching and learning.
“Moreover, the UNESCO recommendations are intended for education in general and do not specifically cater to the needs of university teaching and learning.”
From A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning (2023) · cites this paper as UNESCO, 2021a
The UNESCO recommendations are high-level and general aimed at helping policy-makers better understand the possibilities and implications of AI for teaching and learning to help achieve Sustainable Development Goal 4.
“The UNESCO recommendations are high-level and general aimed at helping policy-makers better understand the possibilities and implications of AI for teaching and learning to help achieve Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all (UNESCO, 2021a)”
From A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning (2023) · cites this paper as UNESCO, 2021a
UNESCO's recommendation is broader, encompassing various aspects of education and advocating for a comprehensive master plan, and its primary target is policymakers.
“UNESCO's recommendation is broader, encompassing various aspects of education and advocating for a comprehensive master plan. Its primary target is policymakers.”
From A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning (2023) · cites this paper as UNESCO, 2021a
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 929
- Authors
- UNESCO
- Corresponding author
- UNESCO
- Venue
- UNESCO eBooks
- Publisher
- UNESCO
- Published
- 2021
- OpenAlex
- W4367159404
- Cited by
- 929
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 287 · 2025: 285 · 2024: 238 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 29
- FWCI
- 117.40
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- UNESCO eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, education policy, AI governance, policy advice, educational technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
