Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world
Abstract
The world has made a global commitment towards open science, embodied in the 2021 UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. Open science has the potential to reduce disparities in science, technology and innovation while advancing global goals and the human right to participate in and benefit from science and its advancements. It serves not only to amplify access to scientific knowledge by everyone for the benefits of science and society but also to promote opportunities for innovation and participation in the creation of scientific knowledge and the sharing of its benefits. In this context, open science offers cultural, social and economic benefits, including improved inclusivity and trust in science, increased impact, streamlined research and enhanced reproducibility. Open practices can make the scientific process more efficient, transparent and reliable, thereby strengthening evidence for decision-making and trust in science. Each of the multiple actors and stakeholders in science and innovation systems has a role to play in the operationalization of open science—as well as benefits to gain. Cooperation and awareness among these actors can optimize investments, strengthen sustainability of scientific initiatives, address implementation challenges and mitigate possible unintended consequences of open science practices. To be fully effective, open science must be embraced globally, involving a profound shift in the global scientific culture.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
La Unesco (2023) ha propuesto licencias abiertas para IAGen, tales como Atribución (BY), No Comercial (NC), Sin derivados (ND) y Compartir Igual (SA).
“Primero, la Unesco (2023) ha propuesto licencias abiertas para IAGen, tales como Atribución (BY); No Comercial (NC); Sin derivados (ND); y Compartir Igual (SA).”
From Derechos de autor y licencias de la inteligencia artificial generativa: un análisis desde la ciencia abierta en América Latina (2025) · cites this paper as Unesco, 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
de México, U. N. A., & Palma Peña, J. M. (2025) · Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología · doi:10.17533/udea.rib.v48n3e358961
- Authors
- UNESCO
- Corresponding author
- UNESCO
- Publisher
- UNESCO
- Published
- 2023
- OpenAlex
- W4388983635
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- UnissResearch (Università degli Studi di Sassari) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
- Keywords
- open science, research transparency, open access, open data, open science policy, global trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review