Construyendo bloques la promiscuidad política online en tiempos de polarización en España
Open accessAbstract
Los excepcionales niveles de polarización política, fragmentación del sistema de partidos y volatilidad electoral que experimenta España en la actualidad recomiendan analizar los orígenes de estos patrones. Empleamos una combinación única de datos de encuestas a nivel individual y de actividad en Twitter pertenecientes a una muestra de usuarios de la Aplicación de Asesoramiento al Voto que lanzamos durante la campaña de las elecciones generales españolas de 2015 para investigar los determinantes ideológicos de la construcción de redes online de los individuos. Nuestros resultados demuestran que, entre los individuos que siguen los perfiles de los partidos/candidatos online, la promiscuidad política es el comportamiento más común, aunque este comportamiento depende en gran medida de las actitudes políticas de los usuarios online y offline entendidas en un sentido amplio.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Garmendia Madariaga, A., Lorenzo Rodríguez, J., & Riera, P.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
- Venue
- Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas
- Published
- 2024-02-06
- Issue
- 178
- Pages
- 61-82
- ISSN
- 0210-5233 (ISSN-L)
- 1988-5903
- OpenAlex
- W4225788837
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- political polarization, party fragmentation, electoral volatility, Twitter, online political activity, 2015 Spanish general election, voting advice applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
