CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesForensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic and Genetic Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analysis of Forensic Anthropology Cases Submitted to the Smithsonian Institution by the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 1962 to 1994

Grisbaum, Gretchen A., Ubelaker, Douglas H.·2001·Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology
DOI 10.5479/si.00810223.45.1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5479/si.00810223.45.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Grisbaum, G. A., & Ubelaker, D. H.
ORCID
Ubelaker, Douglas H.
Venue
Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology
Publisher
Smithsonian Institution
Published
2001
Issue
45
Pages
1-15
ISSN
0081-0223 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5479/si.00810223.45.1
OpenAlex
W1972772934
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Smithsonian contributions to anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
forensic anthropology, FBI, case analysis, skeletal identification, history of forensic anthropology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review