The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica
Open accessAbstract
A 298/165
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science
Shepard, R. N. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3629243 · Cited by 2,416
Tests of General Relativity with GW150914
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.221101 · Cited by 1,773
Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.241102 · Cited by 1,021
Machine learning molecular dynamics for the simulation of infrared spectra
Gastegger, M., Behler, J., & Marquetand, P. (2017) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c7sc02267k · Cited by 556
Metadata
- Authors
- Newton, I.
- Published
- 1687
- OpenAlex
- W2945914100
- Cited by
- 2,851
- References
- 0
- Type
- book
- Language
- la
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5479/sil.52126.39088015628399
- The paper
- Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. https://doi.org/10.5479/sil.52126.39088015628399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
