Cited by 1Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEducational Technology in Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

To AI Is Human: How AI Tools with Their Imperfections Enhance Learning

Open access
Cwiakala, Martin·2024·Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics

Abstract

The education community's sentiment regarding artificial intelligence (AI) is divided. Many see it as a means to cheat and prevent students from developing their intellectual abilities because it is generative and can provide results for many domains. Just as some had predicted that paper use would go down when computers were created, the opposite occurred. AI in the classroom, when utilized effectively, promotes critical thinking and not cheating. New technology can shock and awe those who see it for the first time. Upon closer investigation, the actual capabilities are revealed. While large language models can quickly create reports from very little information, we must examine their ability to create specific reports on topics we desire. Any large language model currently available states that it can make mistakes. Students will grow by learning how to prompt AI tools to provide meaningful results, spot mistakes, and validate their results. Knowing when it is appropriate to use an AI tool and reflecting on the consequences of results being wrong brings a student to a higher level of awareness. Performing these tasks concerning AI results also brings the user into the consciousness of their fallibility.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.54808/jsci.22.07.40

Cites

0 references resolved

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cwiakala, M.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Cwiakala, Martin
Venue
Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics
Published
2024-12
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
40-46
ISSN
1690-4524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406100996
Cited by
1
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of systemics, cybernetics, and informatics/Journal of systemics cybernetics and informatics (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, large language models, generative AI, critical thinking, academic integrity, cheating, prompt engineering, fallibility, student awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review