Expression patterns of PRDM10 during mouse embryonic development
Open accessAbstract
It is well known that PR/SET family members participate in transcriptional regulation via chromatin remodeling. PRDM10 might play an essential role in gene expression, but no such evidence has been observed so far. To assess PRDM10 expression at various stages of mouse development, we performed immunohistochemistry using available PRDM10 antibody. Embryos were obtained from three distinct developmental stages. At E8.5, PRDM10 expression was concentrated in the mesodermal and neural crest populations. As embryogenesis proceeded further to E13.5, PRMD10 expression was mainly in mesoderm-derived tissues such as somites and neural crest-derived populations such as the facial skeleton. This expression pattern was consistently maintained to the fetal growth period E16.5 and adult mouse, suggesting that PRDM10 may function in tissue differentiation. Our study revealed that PRDM10 might be a transcriptional regulator for normal tissue differentiation during mouse embryonic development. [BMB reports 2010; 43(1): 29-33].
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PRDM10 may be related to dendrite growth and neural crest related changes that contributed to the formation of our distinct modern face.
“Although little is known about PRDM10, it may be related to dendrite growth147 and neural crest related changes that contributed to the formation of our distinct modern face148.”
From A catalog of single nucleotide changes distinguishing modern humans from archaic hominins (2019) · cites this paper as [148]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Park, J.-A., & Kim, K.-C.
- Affiliations
- Kangwon National University (KR)
- ORCID
- Kim, Keun-Cheol
- Venue
- BMB Reports
- Published
- 2010-01-31
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-33
- ISSN
- 1976-6696 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036186362
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- BMB Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Korea Basic Science Institute
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology
- Division of Materials Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Renal and related cancers
- Keywords
- mouse embryo development, gene expression patterns, mesoderm, neural crest, somites, facial skeleton, histogenesis, transcriptional regulation, chromatin remodeling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Differentiation, Immunohistochemistry, Mesoderm, Mice, Inbred ICR, Neural Crest, Transcription Factors, Somites, Organogenesis, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Embryonic Development, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review