The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multicultural Education in Canadian Preservice Programs: Teacher Candidates' Perspectives
Open accessAbstract
This report examines Canadian teacher candidates' perspectives on the multicultural education component of the preservice teacher education program they attend. The data analyze were collected through a questionnaire that set out to explore whether teacher candidates were satisfied with the multicultural education preparation they received and their ideas on how it might be improved. We present the findings in two parts. First we consider the teacher candidates' critiques and suggestions on multicultural education to reveal that the majority of respondents did not feel adequately prepared to the challenge teaching in ethno-racially diverse classrooms. Their responses point to specific programmatic and structural shortcomings of current multicultural curricula in Canadian teacher education programs. They suggest ways to improve the multicultural education curriculum including compulsory courses, more diversity among faculty and teacher candidates in the program, and an integrative approach across the teacher education curriculum. We then analyze the discourses embedded in their responses to examine how multicultural education is being understood by teacher candidates. Here we show that common understandings are often articulated through the paradigm of difference, through which the problems and the solutions are believed to be about the Other. We argue that these understandings promote rather than disrupt practices that sustain white hegemony. The article concludes with a disc…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Reforms aiming to prepare teachers better cannot be limited to a single course or left to the practicum (Meskill, 2005; Mujawamariya & Mahrouse, 2004; Taylor & Sobel, 2003).”
From Teacher Preparedness for a Changing Demographic of Language Learners (2011) · cites this paper as Mujawamariya & Mahrouse, 2004
In the citing paper
“The Multicultural Education (ME) curriculum is implemented in many faculties of education across Canada (Mujawamariya & Mahrouse, 2004).”
From Teacher Preparedness for a Changing Demographic of Language Learners (2011) · cites this paper as Mujawamariya & Mahrouse, 2004
Citations
Cited by
Teacher Preparedness for a Changing Demographic of Language Learners
Webster, N. L., & Valeo, A. (2011) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v28i2.1075 · Cited by 67
“The Multicultural Education (ME) curriculum is implemented in many faculties of education across Canada (Mujawamariya & Mahrouse, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Mujawamariya, D., & Mahrouse, G.
- ORCID
- Mahrouse, Gada
- Venue
- Alberta Journal of Educational Research
- Publisher
- University of Calgary
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 336-353
- ISSN
- 0002-4805 (ISSN-L)
- 1923-1857
- OpenAlex
- W4399878057
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Alberta Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary)
- Alberta Journal of Educational Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Keywords
- multicultural education, initial teacher education, white hegemony, teacher education program improvement, Canadian teacher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review