Sustainable agriculture and food systems
Abstract
Modern methods of food production are increasingly recognized as a major contributor to global warming, air and water pollution, deforestation, biodiversity loss, soil degradation and the emergence of disease. In turn, climate change is compromising food security and supply-chain resilience, with related natural disasters driving up food prices. Under the free market system, increasing productivity has been emphasized as the way to meet rising global demand for food. How to move towards sustainability in agriculture, and in food systems more generally, has become an ever more urgent topic of debate at international level. There is little or no consensus among policymakers on how this can be done. Practices such as land conversion in some areas of the world, to create space for increased meat and dairy production, can cancel out environmental gains in other locations and lead to reduced sustainability of the overall food system. This paper seeks to clarify the debate around sustainability in agriculture by examining two distinct versions of sustainability. Each is discussed in terms of its clearly defined underpinning assumptions, including the key question of whether large-scale changes in demand towards healthier, less wasteful and more sustainable diets are possible.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adopting agroecological farm practices such as farm diversification and recycling to reduce external input dependency, promoting synergistic interactions, and empowering farmers including women and youth in natural resource governance fosters economic resilience and productivity.
“Instead, adopting agroecological farm practices, such as farm diversification and recycling to reduce external input dependency, promoting synergistic interactions within farming system components (Benton and Harwatt, 2022), and empowering farmers including women and youth in natural resource governance, fosters economic resilience and productivity.”
From Agroecology for sustainable development: evidence on multidimensional performance from a cross-country TAPE assessment in Africa (2025) · cites this paper as Benton and Harwatt, 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adoyo, B., Geck, M. S., Adeyemi, C., Alpuerto, J., Arinloye, A. A. D.-D., Ateku, D., Autfray, P., Barahona, C., Chacha, R., Cluset, R., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2025.1667882 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Benton, T., & Harwatt, H.
- Published
- 2022-05-24
- OpenAlex
- W4226467469
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Keywords
- sustainable agriculture, food systems, sustainability, food security, climate change, environmental impact of food production, supply chain resilience, food prices, land conversion, dairy and meat production, sustainable diets, food demand, soil degradation, biodiversity loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review