The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emirati and Saudi Students’ Writing Challenges at U.S. Universities
Open accessAbstract
The study examines writing challenges Emirati and Saudi students face at U.S. universities. Based on a sample of 219, a mixed methods approach was used to analyze responses from the participants. The results of the questionnaire reveal that Less than 31% Emirati and Saudi students feel “comfortable” in completing written assignments. The interviews results indicate that Emirati and Saudi students have different opinions regarding writing difficulties. An Emirati student, stated: “I am worried a lot because writing is not easy. Writing is very difficult for us.” However, a Saudi student expressed the easiness of her writing assignments. Emirati students stated that grammar, word choice and sentence construction are “somewhat easy”; however, Saudi students indicated that grammar, word choice and sentence construction are “Somewhat difficult.” An Emirati student, stated: “Most Arabs students are told that we do not have vocabulary or grammar. For me, grammar is okay but my difficulty is how to choose the appropriate word for a sentence. A female Emirati student expressed her worry for grammatical mistakes, which she tries to correct: “When I write my reports, I have to reread my report again because I am sure I will have some grammatical mistakes because English is not my first language. The study implies that the students need more coursework in academic writing to prepare them for their academic writing in their disciplines. U.S. universities need to increase the visiting hours of writing centers and design more workshops that teach the students about writing in various genres.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Al Murshidi (2014) reported that Saudi students need more coursework in academic writing to prepare them for their future disciplines.”
From Factors Underlying Low Achievement of Saudi EFL Learners (2016) · cites this paper as Al Murshidi, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Literacy in Theory and Practice
Searle‐Chatterjee, M., & Street, B. (1987) · Man · doi:10.2307/2802515 · Cited by 4,932
Social Identity, Investment, and Language Learning
Peirce, B. N. (1995) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587803 · Cited by 2,877
Situated literacies : reading and writing in context
Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanič, R. (2000) · Cited by 2,025
Dorian, N. C. (1995) · Language · doi:10.2307/416221 · Cited by 2,024
Identity and language learning : gender, ethnicity and educational change
Norton, B. (2000) · Cited by 2,023
Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community
Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998) · Cited by 1,862
Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change
Yim, Y.-K., & Norton, B. (2001) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588036 · Cited by 1,798
Language, Identity, and the Ownership of English
Norton, B. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587831 · Cited by 1,487
Cross-Cultural Approaches to Literacy
Skar, S. L., & Street, B. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804424 · Cited by 904
Negotiating Participation and Identity in Second Language Academic Communities
Morita, N. (2004) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588281 · Cited by 757
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Casanave, C. P. (1995). Locating interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher, & G. Brain (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language. Essays on research & pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors Underlying Low Achievement of Saudi EFL Learners
Alrabai, F. (2016) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v6n3p21 · Cited by 143
Khudhair, I. I. (2020) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · Cited by 7
Azizah, U. A., & Budiman, A. (2022) · JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies) · doi:10.30762/jeels.v4i2.65 · Cited by 7
Deveci, T., & Midraj, J. (2021) · Russian Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-68-88 · Cited by 6
The Effects Of Wiki-Based Collaborative Writing On Esl Student’s Individual Writing Performance
Alshalan, A. M. (2016) · Human Biology · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Al Murshidi, G.
- Venue
- English Language Teaching
- Published
- 2014-05-14
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1916-4742 (ISSN-L)
- 1916-4750
- OpenAlex
- W2007164195
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- English Language Teaching (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- academic writing difficulties, Emirati students, Saudi students, international students, English as a second language, writing centers, academic writing instruction, grammatical errors, word choice, sentence construction, writing workshop, American universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emirati and Saudi Students’ Writing Challenges at U.S. Universities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5539/elt.v7n6p87
- The paper
- Al Murshidi, G. (2014). Emirati and Saudi Students’ Writing Challenges at U.S. Universities. English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n6p87