Cited by 19EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emirati and Saudi Students’ Writing Challenges at U.S. Universities

Open access
Al Murshidi, Ghadah·2014·English Language Teaching

Abstract

The study examines writing challenges Emirati and Saudi students face at U.S. universities. Based on a sample of 219, a mixed methods approach was used to analyze responses from the participants. The results of the questionnaire reveal that Less than 31% Emirati and Saudi students feel “comfortable” in completing written assignments. The interviews results indicate that Emirati and Saudi students have different opinions regarding writing difficulties. An Emirati student, stated: “I am worried a lot because writing is not easy. Writing is very difficult for us.” However, a Saudi student expressed the easiness of her writing assignments. Emirati students stated that grammar, word choice and sentence construction are “somewhat easy”; however, Saudi students indicated that grammar, word choice and sentence construction are “Somewhat difficult.” An Emirati student, stated: “Most Arabs students are told that we do not have vocabulary or grammar. For me, grammar is okay but my difficulty is how to choose the appropriate word for a sentence. A female Emirati student expressed her worry for grammatical mistakes, which she tries to correct: “When I write my reports, I have to reread my report again because I am sure I will have some grammatical mistakes because English is not my first language. The study implies that the students need more coursework in academic writing to prepare them for their academic writing in their disciplines. U.S. universities need to increase the visiting hours of writing centers and design more workshops that teach the students about writing in various genres.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5539/elt.v7n6p87

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Casanave, C. P. (1995). Locating interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher, & G. Brain (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language. Essays on research & pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Al Murshidi, G.
Venue
English Language Teaching
Published
2014-05-14
Volume
7
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1916-4742 (ISSN-L)
  • 1916-4750
OpenAlex
W2007164195
Cited by
18
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
English Language Teaching (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
academic writing difficulties, Emirati students, Saudi students, international students, English as a second language, writing centers, academic writing instruction, grammatical errors, word choice, sentence construction, writing workshop, American universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emirati and Saudi Students’ Writing Challenges at U.S. Universities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5539/elt.v7n6p87
The paper
Al Murshidi, G. (2014). Emirati and Saudi Students’ Writing Challenges at U.S. Universities. English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n6p87