Cited by 33Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

EFL Saudi Students’ Class Emotions and Their Contributions to Their English Achievement at Taif University

Open access
Ismail, Nasrah M.·2015·International Journal of Psychological Studies

Abstract

This paper investigates class academic emotions of anger, anxiety, enjoyment, hope, hopelessness, pride, boredom and shame in the academic situation and their contributions to Saudi EFL students’ English achievement. It also strives to find if there are any differences in class emotions and achievement according gender and streams (science and humanities). The sample consists of 315 (177 males & 138 females) university students. The Pekrun, Goetz, Titz and Perry (2002) class-related emotions scale was used to determine class emotions of students. The findings revealed that there are no differences between science and humanities (M = 22.763, SD = 8.118) in achievement and class emotions except in boredom in favour of science stream. The results also indicated that there were no differences between males and females in class emotions except in the enjoyment in favour of females. It also revealed that there were significant differences between males and females in English achievement in favour of females. On the other hand, it was found that emotions explained 65.8 % in variance of the students’ academic achievement. Furthermore, the findings have implications for students, teachers, and curriculum developers who are to develop a curriculum well-suited with the needs of language learners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5539/ijps.v7n4p19

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Females significantly outperform males in English achievement among Saudi university students.

    “In a study sample of 315 Saudi university students (177 males and 138 females), Ismail (2015) reported that females significantly outperformed males in English achievement.”

    From Factors Underlying Low Achievement of Saudi EFL Learners (2016) · cites this paper as Ismail (2015)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ismail, N. M.
Corresponding author
Ismail, Nasrah M.
Venue
International Journal of Psychological Studies
Published
2015-10-28
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
19
ISSN
  • 1918-7211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-722X
OpenAlex
W1860653449
Cited by
33
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Journal of Psychological Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
academic emotions, EFL achievement, Saudi university students, anger, anxiety, enjoyment, hope, hopelessness, pride, boredom, shame, gender differences, language learning motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review