The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Government Expenditure on Human Capital Development: Implications for Economic Growth in Nigeria
Open accessAbstract
This study examines the relationship between human capital development efforts of the Government and economic growth in Nigeria. It seeks to find out the impact of government recurrent and capital expenditures on education and health in Nigeria and their effect on economic growth. The data used for the study are from secondary sources while the augmented Solow model was also adopted. The dependent variable in the model is the level of real output while the explanatory variables are government capital and recurrent expenditures on education and health, gross fixed capital formation and the labour force. The result shows that there exists a positive relationship between government recurrent expenditure on human capital development and the level of real output, while capital expenditure is negatively related to the level of real output. The study recommends appropriate channeling of the nation’s capital expenditure on education and health to promote economic growth.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some other studies on human capital, even as they are country specific, like Olaniyan and Okemakinde (2008), Oluwatobi and Ogunrinola (2011), and Eme et al. (2014), Odior (2014) directed attentions to productivity and growth but not a bit on youth employment.”
From Does investment in education and health impact youth employment outcomes? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa (2023) · cites this paper as Oluwatobi and Ogunrinola (2011)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anowor, O. F., Ichoku, H. E., Onodugo, V. A., Ochinanwata, C., & Uzomba, P. C. (2023) · Cogent Economics & Finance · doi:10.1080/23322039.2022.2160128 · Cited by 18
“Some other studies on human capital, even as they are country specific, like Olaniyan and Okemakinde (2008), Oluwatobi and Ogunrinola (2011), and Eme et al. (2014), Odior (2014) directed attentions to productivity and growth but not a bit on youth employment.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Oluwatobi, S. O., & Ogunrinola, O. I.
- Affiliations
- Covenant University (NG)
- Venue
- Journal of Sustainable Development
- Published
- 2011-06-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1913-9063 (ISSN-L)
- 1913-9071
- OpenAlex
- W2003520996
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Sustainable Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Covenant University Repository (Covenant University) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies
- Keywords
- government spending, human capital development, economic growth, recurrent expenditure, capital expenditure, education expenditure, health care costs, augmented Solow model, real output, Nigeria
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review