Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1Eurasian Exchange NetworksIslamic Studies and HistoryMedieval History and Crusades

The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 62 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Frontiers and Place-Names of Kurdistan in the Ilkhanid Period Based on Nuzhat al-Qulūb

Open access
Rahmati, Mohsen·2018·Review of European Studies

Abstract

Based on Mustawfī’s Nuzhat al-Qulūb, this study examins how Kurdistan became a distinct province and locates the boundaries and the cities during the Ilkhanids. Kurdistan was first separated from the Iraq-i ‘Adjam during the period. Given the location of Kurdistan, and given the role of the province in historical events, historical understanding can increase if borders and cities of Kurdistan are definitely located, which is hard work since there is little information thereof, and since the names of such places are erroneously recorded in classical texts.This study shows that Kurdistan became a distinct province after the Seljuqids due to its geography and after the domination of Īvih Turkmen. The province extended from Kangawar to Hulwan, and from the Karkhih River to the Little Zab River. This study determines the locations of towns listed by Mustawfī, as follows: Bahār, the provincial capital, was within the current Ilam province; Khuftiyān, Nīmrāh, Darband-i Tādj Khātūn, and Darband-i Zangī were within Sulaymāniyyih province in Iraq; Alānī, Drbīl (Dartang), Kirind, Khūshān, Māhidasht, Kirmanshah, Wisṭām, Sultanabad-i Chamchamal, Harsin, Kangawar, and Dinawar were within current Kirmanshahan; Alīshtar was, and still is, within Luristan. Moreover, this study finds that the current Kurdistan in Iran had no urban center.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This article argues that Kurdistan became a distinct province from Iraq-i 'Adjam in the early 13th century under Sulaymanshah of Īvih, and uses Mustawfī's *Nuzhat al-Qulūb* to reconstruct its Ilkhanid-era borders and town locations. It places the province from the Karkhih River to the Little Zab River and from Iraq-i 'Arab to the Seymarih River/Asadabad pass, with Bahār Castle as capital in present Ilam rather than Hamadan.

Key findings

  • Kurdistan separated from Iraq-i 'Adjam in the early 13th century, after Seljuq decline, due to mountainous geography and Īvih Turkmen power; Sulaymanshah of Īvih ruled from 1213 onward and paid nearly 2 million dinars in taxes.
  • Ilkhanid Kurdistan's borders are described as Iraq-i 'Arab in the west, Azerbaijan and Dijarbakr in the north, Iraq-i 'Adjam in the east, and Khuzistan in the south; the abstract states it extended from Kangawar to Hulwan and from the Karkhih River to the Little Zab River.
  • Mustawfī's towns are located in four zones: Shahrazur, Khuftiyān, Darband-i Zangī, and Darband-i Tādj Khātūn in present Sulaymāniyyih, Iraq; Alānī, Dartang, Kirind, Khūshān, Māhidasht, Kirmanshah, Wisṭām, Sultanabad-i Chamchamal, Harsin, Kangawar, and Dinawar in Kirmanshahan; Alīshtar in Luristan; and Bahār Castle in Ilam. The current Iranian province of Kurdistan had no urban center.
  • Taxation in the Ilkhanid period decreased to 89.5 percent compared with Sulaymanshah's time; Mongol armies passed through Kurdistan in 1257, and Kirmanshah was entered on 27 Muḥarram 655 A.H./15 February 1257 and its people massacred.

Methods

  • Historical-geographical study based primarily on Hamdullah Mustawfī's *Nuzhat al-Qulūb* (c.1339), compared with classical Islamic geographers, chronicles, Safavid/Qajar sources, and modern local and archaeological reports.
  • Borders and toponyms are identified through textual comparison, orthographic variant analysis, route reconstruction, and correlation with present provinces, rivers, and mountains; no statistical sampling is used.

Limitations

  • The paper states there is little information on Kurdistan's geography, that place-names are erroneously recorded in classical texts, that some town locations are unknown, and that there are no detailed records of the Mongol conquest or internal conditions.
  • Evident from the text: many locations are inferred from variant spellings and later sources using terms such as "seems," "probably," and "can be inferred," and the study relies heavily on Mustawfī, making several identifications tentative.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5539/res.v10n2p68

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 7 Not valid · 62 Not checked · 79 Own results and interpretations

69 more claims

Create a free account to see all 148 claims and every source verdict.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 64
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. lxxvi Rashid al-Din, Jāmi'al-Tawārīkh, 2:1009. lxxvii Juwayni, Tārīkh-i Jahāngushāy,1: 67, 77. lxxviii Ibn al-Athīr, al-Kamil, 8: 705-708; vol.9, 538, 556. lxxix Le Strange, The lands, 189. lxxx http://hamgardi.com/place/23039/(Accessed 2 September 2015) lxxxi -Le Strange, Mesopotamia and Persia, 57.
  2. lxxxiii Abbas Mutarjim, and Ya‗qub Muhammadifar, -A Suggestion on Locatin of Ilkhani city, Sultan abad of Chamchamal (tiny Baghdad) In Bistūn of Kirmanshah‖, Payām-i Bāstānshinās 3(2005): 99-102. Doi: http://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/330156;
  3. Muhammad Eqbal Chehri and Zahid Garavand, -On Intend of Sultan abad of Chamchamal; a Comparison of Historical data with Archaeological Founds in Hale Bag Hill‖, Archaeological Researchs 6 (2012): 59-60. Doi: http://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/magazine/number/56053.
  4. xci Khazradjī, Risālat al-Thānia, 64; Mas'ūdi, al-Tanbīh-i wa-l-Ishrāf,70; Muqaddasi, Aḥsan al-Taqāsīm, 211; Ibn al-Athīr, al-Kāmil, 2:525; 3:16; 8: 202; 9: 464-65, 493, 528-34, 537-40, 545, 570, 612, 650; 11:119, 195, 229, 249, 286, 328,409. xcii Mardūkh, Tārīkh-i Mardūkh, 267. xciii Muqaddasi, Aḥsan al-Taqāsīm, 300; Ravandi, Rāḥat al-Ṣudūr, 375-89. res.ccsenet.org Review of European Studies Vol. 10, No. 2; 2018 xciv Ibn al-Faqīh, Mukhtaṣar al-Buldān, 240. xcv Yaqut al-Hamawi, Mu'djam al-Buldān, vol.5, 410-17. xcvi Mustawfī, Nuzhat al-Qulūb, 71-2. xcvii Juwayni, Tārīkh-i Jahāngushāy, 1: 115-16.

Metadata

Authors
Rahmati, M.
Affiliations
Lorestan University (IR)
Corresponding author
Rahmati, Mohsen
Venue
Review of European Studies
Published
2018-03-28
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
68
ISSN
  • 1918-7173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-7181
OpenAlex
W2794922406
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Review of European Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Eurasian Exchange Networks
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval History and Crusades
Keywords
Kurdistan, Ilkhanid period, provincial boundaries, place names, historical geography, Ilam Province, Lorestan Province, historic towns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Frontiers and Place-Names of Kurdistan in the Ilkhanid Period Based on Nuzhat al-Qulūb. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5539/res.v10n2p68
The paper
Rahmati, M. (2018). The Frontiers and Place-Names of Kurdistan in the Ilkhanid Period Based on Nuzhat al-Qulūb. Review of European Studies. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v10n2p68

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.