Effects of biochar and farm yard manure on soil properties and crop growth in an agroforestry system in the Himalaya
Open accessAbstract
Many parts of South Asia are facing agricultural land degradation and reduced productivity while the population continues to grow and demand for food is ever-increasing. This paper presents the results of research specifically focused on application of biochar and Farm Yard Manure (FYM) at 5t/ha and 20t/ha, respectively as an amendment on degraded soil in a coffee agroforestry system of the mid-hills in the Nepal Himalaya. The study showed that there were significant (P<0.05) positive effects on soil chemical properties, crop growth (height) and crop productivity. In particular, the soil pH and SOM increased significantly, while other soil properties were not significantly improved. Also, plant growth increased dramatically with application of biochar, however, crop yields showed only slight increases. It is suggested that biochar applied at low rates along with FYM generally has immediate positive effects on the vegetative growth of plants, however, soil properties and overall crop yields may take a longer time to show improvement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gautam et al. (2017) reported increased K+ availability upon biochar addition (5 t ha-1) in silty loam Nepalese soil, with main mechanism being high K content in biochar ash and reduced K leaching.
“A recent study by Gautam et al. (2017) reported increased K + availability upon biochar addition (5 t ha -1 ) in silty loam Nepalese soil, the main mechanism being high content of K in biochar ash as well as reduced K leaching (Laird et al., 2010).”
From Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil (2018) · cites this paper as Gautam et al. (2017)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Gautam, D. K., Bajracharya, R. M., & Sitaula, B. K.
- Affiliations
- Kathmandu University (NP)
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Gautam, Deepak K.
- Venue
- Sustainable Agriculture Research
- Published
- 2017-08-27
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 74
- ISSN
- 1927-050X (ISSN-L)
- 1927-0518
- OpenAlex
- W2748174059
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Sustainable Agriculture Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- biochar, farmyard manure, soil amendment, degraded soils, coffee agroforestry, soil chemical properties, soil organic matter, soil pH, crop growth, crop yield, Himalaya
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review