Cited by 38Agricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop Yield

Effects of biochar and farm yard manure on soil properties and crop growth in an agroforestry system in the Himalaya

Open access
Gautam, Deepak K., Bajracharya, Roshan M., Sitaula, Bishal K.·2017·Sustainable Agriculture Research

Abstract

Many parts of South Asia are facing agricultural land degradation and reduced productivity while the population continues to grow and demand for food is ever-increasing. This paper presents the results of research specifically focused on application of biochar and Farm Yard Manure (FYM) at 5t/ha and 20t/ha, respectively as an amendment on degraded soil in a coffee agroforestry system of the mid-hills in the Nepal Himalaya. The study showed that there were significant (P<0.05) positive effects on soil chemical properties, crop growth (height) and crop productivity. In particular, the soil pH and SOM increased significantly, while other soil properties were not significantly improved. Also, plant growth increased dramatically with application of biochar, however, crop yields showed only slight increases. It is suggested that biochar applied at low rates along with FYM generally has immediate positive effects on the vegetative growth of plants, however, soil properties and overall crop yields may take a longer time to show improvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5539/sar.v6n4p74

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gautam et al. (2017) reported increased K+ availability upon biochar addition (5 t ha-1) in silty loam Nepalese soil, with main mechanism being high K content in biochar ash and reduced K leaching.

    “A recent study by Gautam et al. (2017) reported increased K + availability upon biochar addition (5 t ha -1 ) in silty loam Nepalese soil, the main mechanism being high content of K in biochar ash as well as reduced K leaching (Laird et al., 2010).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 38

Authors
Gautam, D. K., Bajracharya, R. M., & Sitaula, B. K.
Affiliations
  • Kathmandu University (NP)
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
Gautam, Deepak K.
Venue
Sustainable Agriculture Research
Published
2017-08-27
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
74
ISSN
  • 1927-050X (ISSN-L)
  • 1927-0518
OpenAlex
W2748174059
Cited by
38
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainable Agriculture Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
biochar, farmyard manure, soil amendment, degraded soils, coffee agroforestry, soil chemical properties, soil organic matter, soil pH, crop growth, crop yield, Himalaya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review