Lower circulating IGF-1 levels in fibromyalgia: meta-analysis highlighting potential pathogenic role
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between circulating insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) levels and fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: Meta-analyses were performed to compare serum/plasma IGF-1 levels in patients with FM and healthy controls and in patients with FM according to subgroups based on region, sample size, data type, publication year, and matched variables (age, sex, and/or BMI). RESULTS: Twelve studies from eleven reports including 512 patients with FM and 308 controls were selected. IGF-1 levels were not found to be decreased in the FM group (standardised mean differences (SMD) =-0.347, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.747 to 0.053, p=0.089. However, sensitivity analysis showed that results of one study significantly affected the pooled SMD (SMD =-0.458, 95% CI: -0.822 to -0.093, p=0.014), indicating that the results of this meta-analysis were unstable. Additionally, the SMD changed to be significant after adjusting for publication bias (SMD =-0.513, 95% CI: -0.924 to -0.102). Stratification according to data type showed a significantly lower IGF-1 level in the FM group with original data (SMD =-0.458, 95% CI: -0.857 to -0.060, p=0.024). Stratification by publication year revealed a significantly lower IGF-1 level in the FM group by recent year (year >2012) (SMD =-0.679, 95% CI: -1.066 to -0.293, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that IGF-1 levels were significantly lower in patients with FM, suggesting that IGF-1 might play an important role in the pathogenesis of FM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large-scale meta-analysis including 512 patients with fibromyalgia and 308 healthy subjects showed that IGF-1 levels in patients with fibromyalgia were significantly reduced.
“A large-scale meta-analysis including 512 patients with FMS and 308 healthy subjects, showed that the level of IGF-1 levels in patients with FMS were significantly reduced (46).”
From Nociplastic pain: the prominent role of non-neuronal cells in central and peripheral sensitization (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nociplastic pain: the prominent role of non-neuronal cells in central and peripheral sensitization
Lai, W., Tang, X., Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Qi, Z., Cao, M., Yuan, C., Yu, J., & Wen, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1677310 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lee, Y. H., & Song, G. G.
- Affiliations
- Korea University (KR)
- Venue
- Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology
- Published
- 2024-10-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1122-1127
- ISSN
- 0392-856X (ISSN-L)
- 1593-098X
- OpenAlex
- W4408649303
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
- Keywords
- fibromyalgia, insulin-like growth factor I, serum biomarkers, fibromyalgia pathogenesis, sensitivity analysis, publication bias
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Male, Middle Aged, Biomarkers, Down-Regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review