Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

La enseñanza de contenidos científicos a través de un modelo “Flipped”: Propuesta de instrucción para estudiantes del Grado de Educación Primaria

González-Gómez, David, Jeong, Jin Su, Cañada-Cañada, Florentina, Gallego Picó, Alejandrina·2017·Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas
DOI 10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2233
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

La metodología de instrucción invertida o «flipped-classroom» constituye un modo de aprendizaje en el cual se invierte el formato tradicional de una clase. En esta metodología, las clases magistrales se imparten «fuera del aula», así el tiempo que el estudiante permanece en el aula se emplea para realizar actividades de aprendizaje más centradas en el alumno, tales como resolución de problemas / casos prácticos, discusiones y trabajo colaborativo. En esta investigación se lleva a cabo un estudio comparativo entre los resultados de aprendizaje y percepción de un grupo de estudiantes del Grado de Educación Primaria hacia los contenidos científicos trabajados. Los resultados preliminares de este estudio indican que los estudiantes que siguieron la metodología flipped lograron mejores resultados de aprendizaje y una mejor percepción tanto hacia el contenido como hacia la metodología.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2233

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Frecuencia de repetición de las palabras más usadas para definir la metodología seguida y los contenidos trabajados tanto en el grupo control (MIT) como en el grupo experimental (MII). El gráfico solo resume las cinco palabras más frecuentes.
Fig. 1 Frecuencia de repetición de las palabras más usadas para definir la metodología seguida y los contenidos trabajados tanto en el grupo control (MIT) como en el grupo experimental (MII). El gráfico solo resume las cinco palabras más frecuentes.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Biggs, J. y tang, C. (2007) Teaching for quality learning at University. Third Edition. The society for research into higher education. Open University Press, UK
  2. Bishop, J. L. y verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. Paper presented a the 120 th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 23-25, Atlanta, GA.
  3. Blair, E.; maharaj, C. y primus, S. (2015). Performance and perception in the flipped classroom. Edu- cation and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9393-5 · DOI
  4. Bull, G.; Ferster, B. y Kjellstrom, W. (2012). Inventing the flipped classrom. Learning with tech- nology, 40, pp. 10-11.
  5. Butt, A. (2014). Student view on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accrediation, 6(1), pp. 33-43.
  6. Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Kinshuk y Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIP- PED model isntead? Computers and Education, 79, pp. 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004 · DOI
  7. ENSEÑANZA DE LAS CIENCIAS, NÚM. 35.2 (2017): 71-87
  8. Christiansen, M. A. (2014). Inverted Teaching: Applying a New Pedagogy to a University Organic Chemistry Class. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), pp. 1845-1850. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400530z · DOI
  9. Crujeiras Pérez, B. y Jiménez Aleixandre, M. P. (2015). Desafíos planteados por las actividades abiertas de indagación en el laboratorio: articulación de conocimientos teóricos y prácticos en las prácticas científicas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 33(1), pp. 63-84. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1469 · DOI
  10. Davies, R. S.; Dean, D. L. y Ball, N. (2013) Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educ Tech Res Dev 61(4), pp. 563-580 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6 · DOI
  11. Dávila Acedo, M. A.; Borrachero Cortés, A. B.; Cañada Cañada, F.; Martínez Borreguero, G. y Sánchez-Martín, J. (2015). Evolución de las emociones que experimentan los estudiantes del grado de maestro en educación primaria, en didáctica de la materia y la energía. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 12(3), pp. 550-564.
  12. Delozier, S. y Rhodes, M. (2016). Flipped classrooms. A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9 · DOI
  13. Ferreri, S. P. y O'connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe77113 · DOI
  14. Findlay-Thompson, S. y Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an un- dergraduate business course. Business Education and Accreditation, 6, pp. 63-71.
  15. Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning and Leadign with Technology, 39, pp. 12-17.
  16. Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., y Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), pp. 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008 · DOI
  17. González-Gómez, D.; Jeong, J. S.; Airado Rodríguez, D.; Cañada-Cañada, F. (2016). Perfor- mance and perception in the flipped learning model: an initial approach to evaluate the effective- ness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, pp. 450-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9 · DOI
  18. Handelsman, J.; Ebert-May, D.; Beichner, R.; Bruns, P.; Chang, A.; Dehaan, R.; Gentile, J.; Lauffer, S.; Steart, J.; Tilghman, S. M., y Wood, W. B. (2004). Policy forum: Scientific tea- ching. Science, 304, pp. 521-522. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096022 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Herreid, C. F. y Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), pp. 62-66.
  20. Hill, J. R., Song, L. y West, R. E. (2009). Social learning theory and web-based learning environ- ments: A review of research and discussion of implications. American Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), pp. 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640902857713 · DOI
  21. Imran, M. (2013) Increasing the intereaction time in a lecture by integrating flipped classroom and just-in-time teaching concepts. J Learn Teach 7, pp.1-13 ENSEÑANZA DE LAS CIENCIAS, NÚM. 35.2 (2017): 71-87
  22. Jarvis, T. y Pell, A. (2004). Primary teachers' changing attitudes and cognition during a tow-year science inservice program and their effect on pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 26, pp.1787-1811. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243763 · DOI
  23. Jeong, J. S.; González-Gómez, D.; Cañada-Cañada, F. (2016). Students' perceptions and emo- tions toward learning in a flipped general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Tech- nology, 25, pp. 747-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9630-8 · DOI
  24. Kim, M. K.; Kim, S. M.; Khera, O. y Getman, J. (2014) The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. Internet High Educ 22, pp. 37-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003 · DOI
  25. Knight, J. K. y Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), pp. 298-310. https://doi.org/10.1187/05-06-0082 · DOI
  26. Long, T.; Logan, J. y Waugh, M. (2016). Students' perceptions of the value of using videos as a pre- class learning experience in the flipped classroom. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4 · DOI
  27. Love, B.; Hodge, A.; Grandgenett, N. y Swift, A. W. (2013). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), pp. 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582 · DOI
  28. Mason, G. S.; Rutar, T. S. y Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted clas- sroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. Education, IEEE Tran- sactions on, 56(4), pp. 430-435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2249066 · DOI
  29. Mattis, K. V. (2015). Flipped classroom versus traditional textbook instruction: Assessing accuracy and mental effort at different levels of mathematical complexity. Technology, Knowledge and Lear- ning, 20(2), pp. 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9238-0 · DOI
  30. Mclaughlin, J. E.; Roth, M. T.; Glatt, D. M.; Gharkholonarehe, N.; Davidson, C. A.; Griffin, L. M. y Mumper, R. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and en- gagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89, pp. 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086 · DOI
  31. Mellado, V.; Borrachero, A. B.; Brígido, M.; Melo, L. V.; Dávila, M. A.; Cañada, F.; Conde, M. C.; Costillo, E.; Cubero, J.; Esteban, R.; Martínez, G.; Ruiz, C.; Sánchez, J.; Garritz, A.; Mellado, L.; Vázquez, B.; Jiménez, R. y Bermejo, M. L. (2014). Las emociones en la ense- ñanza de las ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 32(3), pp. 11-36.
  32. Moraros, J.; Islam, A.; Yu, S.; Banow, R. y Schindelka, B. (2015). Flipping for success: Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC Medical Education, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2 · DOI
  33. Newman, D. L.; Deyoe, M. M.; Connor, K. A. y Lamendola, J. M. (2015). Flipping STEM lera- ning: Impact on students' process of learning and faculty instructional activities. En A. DeMarco (Ed.), Curriculum desing and classroom management: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications (pp. 23-31). Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8246-7. · DOI
  34. ch002 · DOI
  35. ENSEÑANZA DE LAS CIENCIAS, NÚM. 35.2 (2017): 71-87
  36. Osborne, J.; Simon, S. y Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. Instrumental Journal of Science Education, 25, pp. 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199 · DOI
  37. Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, pp. 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003 · DOI
  38. Ruiz-Primo, M. A.; Briggs, D.; Iverson, H.; Talbot, R. y Shepard, L. A. (2011). Impact of under- graduate science course innovations on learning. Science, 331(6022), pp. 1269-1270. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198976 · DOI
  39. Sams, A. y Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students' learning. Technology-Rich learning, 70(6), pp. 16-20.
  40. Sohrabi, B. y Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, pp. 514- 524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.056 · DOI
  41. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, pp. 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4 · DOI
  42. Tourón, J. y Santiago, R. (2015). Flipped Learning model and the development of talent at school. Revista de Educacion, 368, pp. 33-65.
  43. Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Online instruction at home frees class for learning. Educa- tion next, 12(1), pp. 82-83.
  44. Tune, J. D.; Sturek, M. y Basile, D. P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 11(3), pp. 57-77 https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00091.2013 · DOI
  45. Van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I. y Van Der Molen, J. H. W. (2015). Improving primary teacher' atti- tudes toward science by attitude-focused professional development. Journal of Research in Scinece Teaching, 52(5), pp. 710-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21218 · DOI
  46. Young, J. R. (2002). «Hybrid» teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online ins- truction. Chron Higher Educ 48(28):A33-A34
  47. Zawilinski, L. M.; Richard, K. A. y Henry, L. A. (2016). Inverting instruction in literacy methods courses: Making learning more active and personalized. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 59(6), pp. 695-708. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.498 · DOI

Cited by

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., Cañada-Cañada, F., & Gallego Picó, A.
ORCID
Venue
Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas
Publisher
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Published
2017-06-07
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
71-87
ISSN
  • 2174-6486
  • 0212-4521
DOI
10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2233
Cited by
11
References
2
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.