Cited by 38AI in cancer detectionAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

A comparative study of YOLO models and a transformer-based YOLOv5 model for mass detection in mammograms

Open access
COŞKUN, DAMLA, KARABOĞA, DERVİŞ, BAŞTÜRK, ALPER, AKAY, BAHRİYE, NALBANTOĞLU, ÖZKAN UFUK, DOĞAN, SERAP, PAÇAL, İSHAK, KARAGÖZ, MERYEM ALTIN·2023·Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences

Abstract

Breast cancer is a prevalent form of cancer across the globe, and if it is not diagnosed at an early stage it can be life-threatening. In order to aid in its diagnosis, detection, and classification, computer-aided detection (CAD) systems are employed. You Only Look Once (YOLO)-based CAD algorithms have become very popular owing to their highly accurate results for object detection tasks in recent years. Therefore, the most popular YOLO models are implemented to compare the performance in mass detection with various experiments on the INbreast dataset. In addition, a YOLO model with an integrated Swin Transformer in its backbone is proposed for mass detection in mammography images within the study. The performance of YOLOv5 models and a transformer-based YOLO model is compared to that of each other and YOLOv3 and YOLOv4 models using images with different sizes on the INbreast dataset. The best results are obtained by the transformer-based YOLO model of YOLOv5 for 832 × 832 image size. In another experiment, we compared the default anchors against the anchors provided by the YOLOv5 autoanchor function before training and saw that the anchors generated by the YOLOv5 autoanchor increased the success rates. Furthermore, various experiments were conducted to observe how data augmentation affects performance. Although a small amount of data was used in the study, high performance was obtained by YOLO algorithms, which are promising tools for cancer detection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.55730/1300-0632.4048

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
COŞKUN, D., KARABOĞA, D., BAŞTÜRK, A., AKAY, B., NALBANTOĞLU, Ö. U., DOĞAN, S., PAÇAL, İ., & KARAGÖZ, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Erciyes University (TR)
  • Iğdır Üniversitesi (TR)
Corresponding author
COŞKUN, DAMLA
Venue
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
Published
2023-11-30
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
1294-1313
ISSN
1300-0632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389223917
Cited by
38
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 11
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Erciyes Üniversitesi
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu (100/ 2000)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
breast cancer, mammography, breast mass detection, computer-aided detection, YOLOv5, Swin Transformer, object detection, INbreast dataset, data augmentation, YOLOv3, YOLOv4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review