A comparative study of YOLO models and a transformer-based YOLOv5 model for mass detection in mammograms
Open accessAbstract
Breast cancer is a prevalent form of cancer across the globe, and if it is not diagnosed at an early stage it can be life-threatening. In order to aid in its diagnosis, detection, and classification, computer-aided detection (CAD) systems are employed. You Only Look Once (YOLO)-based CAD algorithms have become very popular owing to their highly accurate results for object detection tasks in recent years. Therefore, the most popular YOLO models are implemented to compare the performance in mass detection with various experiments on the INbreast dataset. In addition, a YOLO model with an integrated Swin Transformer in its backbone is proposed for mass detection in mammography images within the study. The performance of YOLOv5 models and a transformer-based YOLO model is compared to that of each other and YOLOv3 and YOLOv4 models using images with different sizes on the INbreast dataset. The best results are obtained by the transformer-based YOLO model of YOLOv5 for 832 × 832 image size. In another experiment, we compared the default anchors against the anchors provided by the YOLOv5 autoanchor function before training and saw that the anchors generated by the YOLOv5 autoanchor increased the success rates. Furthermore, various experiments were conducted to observe how data augmentation affects performance. Although a small amount of data was used in the study, high performance was obtained by YOLO algorithms, which are promising tools for cancer detection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This model provides reliable detection of early-stage breast cancer, significantly aiding radiologists in making timely and accurate diagnoses.
“This model provides reliable detection of early-stage breast cancer, significantly aiding radiologists in making timely and accurate diagnoses [51].”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [51]
YOLOv3 has been successfully implemented to detect breast abnormalities in mammograms, using fusion models to enhance the accuracy of classification.
“YOLOv3 has been successfully implemented to detect breast abnormalities in mammograms, using fusion models to enhance the accuracy of classification.”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [51]
Cites
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803 · see citing works
Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Guo, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00986 · Cited by 35,534 · see citing works
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11929 · Cited by 21,793 · see citing works
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Wagle, N. S., & Jemal, A. (2023) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21763 · Cited by 16,303 · see citing works
Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040
Arnold, M., Morgan, E., Rumgay, H., Mafra, A., Singh, D., Laversanne, M., Vignat, J., Gralow, J. R., Cardoso, F., Siesling, S., et al. (2022) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010 · Cited by 3,411 · see citing works
Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution
Liu, Z., Hu, H., Lin, Y., Yao, Z., Xie, Z., Wei, Y., Ning, J., Cao, Y., Zhang, Z., Dong, L., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.09883 · Cited by 2,679 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
- Authors
- COŞKUN, D., KARABOĞA, D., BAŞTÜRK, A., AKAY, B., NALBANTOĞLU, Ö. U., DOĞAN, S., PAÇAL, İ., & KARAGÖZ, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Erciyes University (TR)
- Iğdır Üniversitesi (TR)
- Corresponding author
- COŞKUN, DAMLA
- Venue
- Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
- Published
- 2023-11-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1294-1313
- ISSN
- 1300-0632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389223917
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 11
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCES (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Erciyes Üniversitesi
- Yükseköğretim Kurulu (100/ 2000)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Keywords
- breast cancer, mammography, breast mass detection, computer-aided detection, YOLOv5, Swin Transformer, object detection, INbreast dataset, data augmentation, YOLOv3, YOLOv4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review