Decreased frontal, striatal and cerebellar activation in adults with ADHD during an adaptive delay discounting task
Open accessAbstract
An important characteristic of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a bias towards small immediate versus larger delayed rewards, but it is not known if this symptom is also a feature of adult ADHD. A delay-discounting task was administered to participants with adult ADHD and a comparison group in conjunction with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants responded to a series of questions that required judgments between small sums of money available immediately and larger sums obtained after a temporal delay. Question parameters were adjusted by an adaptive algorithm designed to converge on each participant's discounting indifference point, an individual set point at which there is equal valuation of both choices. In all participants, robust task activation was observed in regions previously identified in functional imaging studies of delay discounting. However, adults with ADHD showed less task activation in a number of regions including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, superior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate, caudate nucleus and declive of the cerebellum. Additionally, the degree to which a participant discounted delayed rewards was inversely related to task activation in the cerebellum. The results suggest that the bias towards immediate rewards in childhood ADHD may not persist behaviorally, but instead present in adulthood as alterations in frontostriatal and frontocerebellar networks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reduced activation and abnormal brain-behavior correlations during temporal discounting have been observed in ADHD children and adults most prominently in typical areas of temporal discounting including ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, insular, dorsal and ventral striatal and thalamic regions as well as parietal lobe and cerebellum.
“Reduced activation and abnormal brain-behavior correlations during temporal discounting have been observed in ADHD children and adults most prominently in typical areas of temporal discounting including ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, insular, dorsal and ventral striatal and thalamic regions as well as parietal lobe and cerebellum (Rubia et al., 2009a; Chantiluke et al., 2014;”
From Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Its Clinical Translation (2018) · cites this paper as Ortiz et al., 2015
The Neuroimaging results and Discussion (page unavailable) report reduced activation during delay discounting in adults with ADHD, including frontal, parietal, caudate and cerebellar regions, and correlations between discounting rate and activation in frontal and cerebellar regions. The Discussion also reports frontal, parietal and cerebellar decreases in an adolescent study. This paper does not establish the full regional list attributed to it, particularly insular and thalamic regions, or abnormal brain–behavior correlations across that list. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 40
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wechsler D (2006) Wechsler intelligence scale for children -Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX, USA.
- Authors
- Ortiz, N., Parsons, A., Whelan, R., Brennan, K., Agan, M., O'Connell, R., Bramham, J., & Garavan, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Vermont (US)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Venue
- Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
- Published
- 2015-09-30
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-338
- ISSN
- 0065-1400 (ISSN-L)
- 1689-0035
- OpenAlex
- W2411026749
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University College Dublin
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- adult ADHD, delay discounting, impulsivity, immediate versus delayed rewards, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, cerebellum, anterior cingulate cortex, fronto-striatal network
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cerebellum, Corpus Striatum, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Young Adult, Delay Discounting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review