Cited by 41Asthma and respiratory diseasesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchOccupational exposure and asthma

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

World Asthma Day. GINA 2014: a global asthma strategy for a global problem

Reddel, Helen K, Hurd, Suzanne S, FitzGerald, J Mark·2014·The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5588/ijtld.14.0246

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Reddel, H. K., Hurd, S. S., & FitzGerald, J. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
505-506
ISSN
  • 1027-3719 (ISSN-L)
  • 1815-7920
OpenAlex
W1978554279
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
asthma, Global Initiative for Asthma, asthma management, asthma treatment guidelines
MeSH terms
Asthma, Cooperative Behavior, Health Promotion, Humans, International Cooperation, Global Health, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review