Where technology does not go: specialised neonatal care in resource-poor and conflict-affected contexts
Open accessAbstract
Setting: Although neonatal mortality is gradually decreasing worldwide, 98% of neonatal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, where hospital care for sick and premature neonates is often unavailable. Médecins Sans Frontières Operational Centre Brussels (MSF-OCB) managed eight specialised neonatal care units (SNCUs) at district level in low-resource and conflict-affected settings in seven countries. Objective: To assess the performance of the MSF SNCU model across different settings in Africa and Southern Asia, and to describe the set-up of eight SNCUs, neonate characteristics and clinical outcomes among neonates from 2012 to 2015. Design: Multicentric descriptive study. Results: The MSF SNCU model was characterised by an absence of high-tech equipment and an emphasis on dedicated nursing and medical care. Focus was on the management of hypothermia, hypoglycaemia, feeding support and early identification/treatment of infection. Overall, 11 970 neonates were admitted, 41% of whom had low birthweight (<2500 g). The main diagnoses were low birthweight, asphyxia and neonatal infections. Overall mortality was 17%, with consistency across the sites. Chances of survival increased with higher birthweight. Conclusion: The standardised SNCU model was implemented across different contexts and showed in-patient outcomes within acceptable limits. Low-tech medical care for sick and premature neonates can and should be implemented at district hospital level in low-resource settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mortality rates are often undifferentiated by weight categories, which is particularly important for analyzing comparisons, trends and quality of care in facilities given the marked differences in expected mortality.
“Mortality rates are often undifferentiated by weight categories, which is particularly important for analyzing comparisons, trends and quality of care in facilities given the marked differences in expected mortality [47].”
Cites
Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: How many newborn babies can we save?
Darmstadt, G. L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cousens, S., Adam, T., Walker, N., & de Bernis, L. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71088-6 · Cited by 1,541 · see citing works
Ndelema, B., Van den Bergh, R., Manzi, M., van den Boogaard, W., Kosgei, R. J., Zuniga, I., Juvenal, M., & Reid, A. (2016) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1666-y · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Russell, N., Tappis, H., Mwanga, J. P., Black, B., Thapa, K., Handzel, E., Scudder, E., Amsalu, R., Reddi, J., Palestra, F., et al. (2022) · Conflict and Health · doi:10.1186/s13031-022-00440-6 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Mortality rates are often undifferentiated by weight categories, which is particularly important for analyzing comparisons, trends and quality of care in facilities given the marked differences in expected mortality [47].”
BackgroundA systematic review of newborn health interventions in humanitarian settings
Rodo, M., Duclos, D., DeJong, J., Akik, C., & Singh, N. S. (2022) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009082 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dörnemann, J., van den Boogaard, W., Van den Bergh, R., Takarinda, K. C., Martinez, P., Bekouanebandi, J. G., Javed, I., Ndelema, B., Lefèvre, A., Khalid, G. G., & Zuniga, I.
- Affiliations
- Médecins Sans Frontières (BE)
- Ministry of Health and Child Welfare (ZW)
- Kaiser Permanente San Rafael Medical Center (US)
- Médecins Sans Frontières (ZA)
- Ministère de la Santé Publique (BI)
- Venue
- Public Health Action
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-174
- ISSN
- 2220-8372 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5493100
- OpenAlex
- W2732765810
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Public Health Action (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Medecins Sans Frontieres Field Research (Medecins Sans Frontieres) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Department for International Development
- International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
- Fondation Veuve Emile Metz-Tesch
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Keywords
- resource-limited settings, conflict-affected settings, neonatal mortality, low birth weight, hypothermia management, hypoglycemia, neonatal infection, asphyxia, district hospitals, Médecins Sans Frontières, neonatal survival
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review