Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Impact of Developments in Artificial Intelligence on Copyright and other Intellectual Property Laws

Israhadi, Evita Isretno·2023·Journal of Law and Sustainable Development
DOI 10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1965
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of AI breakthroughs on copyright and challenges faced by intellectual property legal protection systems. Specifically, the study aims to analyze the implications of AI-generated works in the context of copyright law in Indonesia. Method: The research employs a normative legal approach, utilizing secondary data sources including books, legal journals, research findings, and statutory regulatory documents. The study focuses on relevant legal frameworks, such as Law No. 28 of 2014 governing copyright in Indonesia. The analysis is based on existing literature and legal documents to understand the current state of AI-generated works and their eligibility for copyright protection. Result: The research findings reveal that according to Law Number 28 of 2014 in Indonesia, AI-generated works do not meet the originality standards required for copyright protection. However, users of AI-generated works are still bound by the terms and conditions set by the AI platform, which can limit their rights to the work. The impact of AI developments on copyright law includes challenges related to determining creators and copyright holders, redefining the concept of originality, increased instances of copyright infringement, issues concerning moral and personality rights, and collaborations involving both humans and AI. Additionally, challenges related to database protection and patent protection in the context of AI are also highlighted. Conclusion: In conclusion, the advancement of AI technology introduces complexities in intellectual property law. The existing legal frameworks, such as copyright laws, need further adaptation and clarification to effectively regulate AI-generated works in the digital era. Addressing issues related to originality, creatorship, and collaborative works involving AI requires careful consideration and legal adjustments. Additionally, challenges related to database and patent protection in the realm of AI need to be addressed to ensure comprehensive intellectual property protection in the face of evolving technologies. Legal adaptation and clarification are crucial to navigating the intricate intersection of AI and intellectual property law.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1965

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Adamopoulou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2020). An overview of chatbot technology. In IFIP international conference on artificial intelligence applications and innovations (pp. 373-383). Springer, Cham. · DOI
  2. Agarwal, P., Swami, S., & Malhotra, S. K. (2022). Artificial intelligence adoption in the post COVID-19 new-normal and role of smart technologies in transforming business: a review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. · DOI
  3. Akili, R. H., & Achmad, W. (2023). The Role of Political Parties in the Implementation of Democratic General Elections in the Indonesian State Administration System. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(4), e551-e551. · DOI
  4. Álvarez-Risco, A., & Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S. (2021). A note on changing regulation in international business: the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and artificial intelligence. In The multiple dimensions of institutional complexity in international business research (pp. 363-371). Emerald Publishing Limited. · DOI
  5. Čerka, P., Grigienė, J., & Sirbikytė, G. (2017). Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems?. Computer law & security review, 33(5), 685-699. · DOI
  6. Chesterman, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the limits of legal personality. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(4), 819-844. · DOI
  7. Cunneen, M., Mullins, M., & Murphy, F. (2019). Autonomous vehicles and embedded artificial intelligence: The challenges of framing machine driving decisions. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 33(8), 706-731. · DOI
  8. Davies, C. R. (2011). An evolutionary step in intellectual property rights–Artificial intelligence and intellectual property. Computer Law & Security Review, 27(6), 601-619. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dinwoodie, G. B. (2017). The development and incorporation of international norms in the formation of copyright law. In The Globalization of International Law (pp. 421-470). Routledge. · DOI
  10. Dreyfuss, R. C. (2010). Does IP need IP? Accommodating intellectual production outside the intellectual property paradigm. Cardozo Law Review, 31(5), 10-43. · DOI
  11. Goldstein, P. (2001). International copyright: principles, law, and practice. Oxford University Press, USA. · DOI
  12. Gordon, W. J. (1993). A property right in self-expression: Equality and individualism in the natural law of intellectual property. The Yale Law Journal, 102(7), 1533-1609. · DOI
  13. Gurkaynak, G., Yilmaz, I., & Haksever, G. (2016). Stifling artificial intelligence: Human perils. Computer Law & Security Review, 32(5), 749-758. · DOI
  14. Hunt, E. B. (2014). Artificial intelligence. Academic Press.
  15. Hutukka, P. (2023). Copyright Law in the European Union, the United States and China. IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54(7), 1044-1080. · DOI
  16. Jannah, M. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Haki) Dalam Hak Cipta Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 6(2), 55-72. · DOI
  17. Kulshreshth, A., Anand, A., & Lakanpal, A. (2019, October). Neuralink-an Elon Musk start-up achieve symbiosis with artificial intelligence. In 2019 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS) (pp. 105-109). IEEE. · DOI
  18. Kusmawan, D. (2014). Perlindungan hak cipta atas buku. Perspektif, 19(2), 137-143. · DOI
  19. Lloyd, I. (2018). The Difficulty of Aligning Data Retention with Human Rights Protection. Computer Law Review International, 19(3), 72-74. · DOI
  20. Lu, B. (2021). A theory of ‘authorship transfer’and its application to the context of Artificial Intelligence creations. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 11(1), 2-24. · DOI
  21. Merges, R. P. (2017). One hundred years of solicitude: intellectual property law, 1900–2000. In Intellectual Property Law and History (pp. 431-484). Routledge. · DOI
  22. Miernicki, M., & Ng, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence and moral rights. AI & SOCIETY, 36, 319-329. · DOI
  23. (1) Letter K of Act Number 28 of 2014 Concerning Copyrights. UNISKA LAW REVIEW, 4(1), 95-110.
  24. Selvadurai, N., & Matulionyte, R. (2020). Reconsidering creativity: copyright protection for works generated using artificial intelligence. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15(7), 536-543. · DOI
  25. Sidiq, R. S. S., Jalil, A., & Achmad W, R. W. (2021). Virtual World Solidarity: How Social Solidarity is Built on the Crowdfunding Platform Kitabisa. com. Webology, 18(1). · DOI
  26. Simatupang, K. M. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hak Cipta Dalam Ranah Digital. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 15(1), 67. · DOI
  27. Story, A. (2017). Burn berne: 1 why the leading International copyright convention must be repealed. In Copyright law (pp. 3-41). Routledge. · DOI
  28. Sturm, B. L., Iglesias, M., Ben-Tal, O., Miron, M., & Gómez, E. (2019, September). Artificial intelligence and music: open questions of copyright law and engineering praxis. In Arts (Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 115). MDPI. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Thorne, S. (2020). Hey Siri, tell me a story: Digital storytelling and AI authorship. Convergence, 26(4), 808-823. · DOI
  30. Vesala, J. (2023). Developing Artificial Intelligence-Based Content Creation: Are EU Copyright and Antitrust Law Fit for Purpose? IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54(3), 351-380. · DOI
  31. Winston, P. H. (1984). Artificial intelligence. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
  32. Zatarain, J. M. N. (2017). The role of automated technology in the creation of copyright works: the challenges of artificial intelligence. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 31(1), 91-104. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Zsazsa, C. S. K. M., & Sitepu, E. (2023). Implementasi Artificial Intelligence pada Pelayanan Publik. All Fields of Science Journal Liaison Academia and Sosiety, 3(3), 24-42. · DOI

Cited by

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Israhadi, E. I.
ORCID
Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Venue
Journal of Law and Sustainable Development
Publisher
Brazilian Journals
Published
2023-11-06
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
e1965
ISSN
2764-4170
DOI
10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1965
Cited by
8
References
0
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Developments in Artificial Intelligence on Copyright and other Intellectual Property Laws. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1965
The paper
Israhadi, E. I. (2023). The Impact of Developments in Artificial Intelligence on Copyright and other Intellectual Property Laws. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1965