The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE INNOVATIVE POTENTIAL OF THE FIVE OLYMPIC RINGSMETHOD IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THECONTEXT OF EDUCATIONALDIGITALIZATION
Abstract
This study focuses on the theoretical and methodological principles underlying the use of theFive Olympic Rings Method in English language instruction amid the ongoing digital transformation ofeducation. The research examines the conditions necessary for integrating this method into a technology-enhanced learning environment and evaluates its consistency with learner-centered and competence-oriented models of foreign language education. Special emphasis is placed on the instructional capacityof the method to promote the development of communicative, cognitive, and intercultural competences, aswell as to support the formation of critical thinking, self-directed learning skills, and digital literacy. Inaddition, the paper analyzes the role of information and communication technologies, digital platforms,interactive educational tools, and blended learning formats in the practical implementation of the FiveOlympic Rings Method. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is validated through the results of apedagogical experiment carried out in secondary schools and higher education institutions in theRepublic of Uzbekistan. The findings reveal measurable improvements in learners’ language proficiency,increased motivation to learn, and greater involvement in instructional activities.The researchdemonstrates that the structured application of the Five Olympic Rings Method facilitates learnerautonomy, encourages the use of effective language learning strategies, and enhances themastery oflexical and grammatical material within a digital learning context. Overall, the results substantiate thepedagogical value of incorporating the Five Olympic Rings Method into a continuous languageeducation framework and underline its relevancefor the digital modernization of contemporaryeducational systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Babaniyazova, N.
- Affiliations
- Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers (UZ)
- Corresponding author
- Babaniyazova, N.
- Venue
- Bulletin Dulaty University
- Publisher
- Dulaty University
- Published
- 2026-03-30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 213-220
- ISSN
- 2788-4724 (ISSN-L)
- 2790-833X
- OpenAlex
- W7155564728
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- DULATY UNIVERSITY BULLETIN (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Foreign Language Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Education › Education, Innovation and Language Studies
- Keywords
- English language teaching, digitalization of education, student-centered learning, competence-oriented approach, communicative competence, intercultural competence, critical thinking, self-directed learning, digital literacy, blended learning, learner autonomy, language learning strategies, student motivation, secondary and higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.