The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
Open accessAbstract
and research centre known for work in health services, particularly health economics and public health.More information about the authors, their research interests, and publication
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Evidence Based Checklist for the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS EBC)
McGowan, J., Sampson, M., & Lefebvre, C. (2010) · Evidence Based Library and Information Practice · doi:10.18438/b8sg8r · Cited by 200
Cited by
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777 · Cited by 1,110
Customer experience: fundamental premises and implications for research
Becker, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00718-x · Cited by 944
How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature
Pati, D., & Lorusso, L. N. (2018) · HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal · doi:10.1177/1937586717747384 · Cited by 601
Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements
Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L., & Booth, A. (2019) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/hir.12276 · Cited by 570
Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2021) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650220958224 · Cited by 534
“…our definitions of (1) CMC and (2) MH, (3) their conceptual independence, and (4) include investigations of non-clinical samples) and methodology (i.e., synthesis articles had to be (5) systematic (Booth et al., 2012), (6) synthesize empirical evidence, and be (7) written in English and published).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- MacDonald, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l'Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada
- Publisher
- University of Alberta Libraries
- Published
- 2014-07-21
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46
- ISSN
- 1708-6892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132698877
- Cited by
- 863
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5596/c13-009
- The paper
- MacDonald, J. (2014). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l'Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada. https://doi.org/10.5596/c13-009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
