Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 410

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature

Open access
Hawksworth, David L., Crous, Pedro W., Redhead, Scott A., Reynolds, Don R., Samson, Robert A., Seifert, Keith A., Taylor, John W., Wingfield, Michael J., Abaci, Özlem, Aime, Catherine, Asan, Ahmet, Bai, Feng-Yan, de Beer, Z. Wilhelm, Begerow, Dominik, Berikten, Derya, Boekhout, Teun, Buchanan, Peter K., Burgess, Treena, Buzina, Walter, Cai, Lei, Cannon, Paul F., Crane, J. Leland, Damm, Ulrike, Daniel, Heide-Marie, van Diepeningen, Anne D., Druzhinina, Irina, Dyer, Paul S., Eberhardt, Ursula, Fell, Jack W., Frisvad, Jens C., Geiser, David M., Geml, József, Glienke, Chirlei, Gräfenhan, Tom, Groenewald, Johannes Z., Groenewald, Marizeth, de Gruyter, Johannes, Guého-Kellermann, Eveline, Guo, Liang-Dong, Hibbett, David S., Hong, Seung-Beom, de Hoog, G. Sybren, Houbraken, Jos, Huhndorf, Sabine M., Hyde, Kevin D., Ismail, Ahmed, Johnston, Peter R., Kadaifciler, Duygu G., Kirk, Paul M., Kõljalg, Urmas, Kurtzman, Cletus P., Lagneau, Paul-Emile, Lévesque, C. André, Liu, Xingzhong, Lombard, Lorenzo, Meyer, Wieland, Miller, Andrew, Minter, David W., Najafzadeh, Mohammad Javad, Norvell, Lorelei, Ozerskaya, Svetlana M., Öziç, Rasime, Pennycook, Shaun R., Peterson, Stephen W., Pettersson, Olga V., Quaedvlieg, William, Robert, Vincent A., Ruibal, Constantino, Schnürer, Johan, Schroers, Hans-Josef, Shivas, Roger, Slippers, Bernard, Spierenburg, Henk, Takashima, Masako, Taşkoin, Evrim, Thines, Marco, Thrane, Ulf, Uztan, Alev Haliki, van Raak, Marcel, Varga, János, Vasco, Aida, Verkley, Gerard, Videira, Sandra I. R., de Vries, Ronald P., Weir, Bevan S., Yilmaz, Neriman, Yurkov, Andrey, Zhang, Ning·2011·IMA Fungus

Abstract

The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature was agreed at an international symposium convened in Amsterdam on 19-20 April 2011 under the auspices of the International Commission on the Taxonomy of Fungi (ICTF). The purpose of the symposium was to address the issue of whether or how the current system of naming pleomorphic fungi should be maintained or changed now that molecular data are routinely available. The issue is urgent as mycologists currently follow different practices, and no consensus was achieved by a Special Committee appointed in 2005 by the International Botanical Congress to advise on the problem. The Declaration recognizes the need for an orderly transitition to a single-name nomenclatural system for all fungi, and to provide mechanisms to protect names that otherwise then become endangered. That is, meaning that priority should be given to the first described name, except where that is a younger name in general use when the first author to select a name of a pleomorphic monophyletic genus is to be followed, and suggests controversial cases are referred to a body, such as the ICTF, which will report to the Committee for Fungi. If appropriate, the ICTF could be mandated to promote the implementation of the Declaration. In addition, but not forming part of the Declaration, are reports of discussions held during the symposium on the governance of the nomenclature of fungi, and the naming of fungi known only from an environmental nucleic acid sequence in particular. Possible amendments to the Draft BioCode (2011) to allow for the needs of mycologists are suggested for further consideration, and a possible example of how a fungus only known from the environment might be described is presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.14

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 410

Metadata

Authors
Hawksworth, D. L., Crous, P. W., Redhead, S. A., Reynolds, D. R., Samson, R. A., Seifert, K. A., Taylor, J. W., Wingfield, M. J., Abaci, Ö., Aime, C., Asan, A., Bai, F.-Y., de Beer, Z. W., Begerow, D., Berikten, D., Boekhout, T., Buchanan, P. K., Burgess, T., Buzina, W., Cai, L., Cannon, P. F., Crane, J. L., Damm, U., Daniel, H.-M., van Diepeningen, A. D., Druzhinina, I., Dyer, P. S., Eberhardt, U., Fell, J. W., Frisvad, J. C., Geiser, D. M., Geml, J., Glienke, C., Gräfenhan, T., Groenewald, J. Z., Groenewald, M., de Gruyter, J., Guého-Kellermann, E., Guo, L.-D., Hibbett, D. S., Hong, S.-B., de Hoog, G. S., Houbraken, J., Huhndorf, S. M., Hyde, K. D., Ismail, A., Johnston, P. R., Kadaifciler, D. G., Kirk, P. M., Kõljalg, U., Kurtzman, C. P., Lagneau, P.-E., Lévesque, C. A., Liu, X., Lombard, L., Meyer, W., Miller, A., Minter, D. W., Najafzadeh, M. J., Norvell, L., Ozerskaya, S. M., Öziç, R., Pennycook, S. R., Peterson, S. W., Pettersson, O. V., Quaedvlieg, W., Robert, V. A., Ruibal, C., Schnürer, J., Schroers, H.-J., Shivas, R., Slippers, B., Spierenburg, H., Takashima, M., Taşkoin, E., Thines, M., Thrane, U., Uztan, A. H., van Raak, M., Varga, J., Vasco, A., Verkley, G., Videira, S. I. R., de Vries, R. P., Weir, B. S., Yilmaz, N., Yurkov, A., & Zhang, N.
Venue
IMA Fungus
Published
2011-06
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
105-111
ISSN
  • 2210-6340 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-6359
OpenAlex
W2161965506
Cited by
410
References
0
FWCI
15.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.14
The paper
Hawksworth, D. L., Crous, P. W., Redhead, S. A., Reynolds, D. R., Samson, R. A., Seifert, K. A., Taylor, J. W., Wingfield, M. J., Abaci, Ö., Aime, C., Asan, A., Bai, F.-Y., de Beer, Z. W., Begerow, D., Berikten, D., Boekhout, T., Buchanan, P. K., Burgess, T., Buzina, W., . . . Zhang, N. (2011). The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature. IMA Fungus. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.14

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.