Cited by 9Plant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesAgricultural Science and FertilizationPlant Growth Enhancement Techniques

Effect of different fertilizers on the mineral content of pumpkin fruit

Open access
Paulauskiene, Aurelija, Danilcenko, Honorata, Taraseviciene, Zivile, Paulauskiene, Aurelija, Pranckietiene, Irena·2018·Journal of Elementology

Abstract

Pumpkin is a vegetable that contains relatively large amounts of biologically active substances. Vegetables are best known as a source of carotenoids and dietary fibres. In addition to this, the pumpkin pulp accumulates significant quantities of minerals. The aim of this work was to identify the most effective fertilizers stimulating accumulation of mineral compounds. The experiment was carried out at the Experimental Station of Aleksandras Stulginskis University, in the central part of Lithuania. Six pumpkins cultivars have been investigated: Cucurbita maxima Duch. – Stofuntovaja, Bambino, Kroshka; Cucurbita moschata (Duch.) Duch. ex Poir. – Zemcuzina; Cucurbita pepo L. – Miranda, Golosemiannaja. The experiment was carried out in five combinations: no fertilization (control), humic substances (HS) fertilizer, complex fertilizers, compost and mixture of complex fertilizers, and humic substances fertilizers. The amounts of macro- and micro-elements were determined in dry matter of the pumpkin fruit pulp by the inductive plasma mass spectrometry method. The data of the analyses showed that the mixture of complex and HS fertilizers had the strongest positive influence on the accumulation of dry matter in the pumpkin fruit. All the fertilizers increased the amount of crude ash in the pumpkin fruit, but no significant differences among the fertilizers and cultivars were found. The biggest amounts of crude ash accumulated in pumpkins fertilized with the complex fertilizers and the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5601/jelem.2017.22.4.1440

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paulauskiene, A., Danilcenko, H., Taraseviciene, Z., Paulauskiene, A., & Pranckietiene, I.
Venue
Journal of Elementology
Published
2018-05-20
Issue
3/2018
ISSN
1644-2296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806634545
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Elementology (publishedVersion)
  • Vytautas Magnus University (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques
Keywords
pumpkin, Cucurbita, mineral content, fertilizers, humic substances, compound fertilizer, compost, fruit pulp, macro- and microelements, calcium, iron, manganese, zinc, copper, crude ash, pumpkin cultivars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review