The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diversity's Promise for Higher Education
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Leadership within the inquiry group is important to its success, with one or more individuals providing direction and maintaining group dynamics and working relationships.
“Leadership within the inquiry group is important to its success with one or more individuals that provide direction for the inquiry process and that are able to maintain the group dynamics and working relationships (Kezar et al., 2008;Smith, 2020).”
From Moving Toward Institutional Culture Change in Higher Education: An Exploration into Cross-functional Professional Learning Communities (2025) · cites this paper as Smith, 2020
Campuses with stronger institutional research offices that included their institutional research representative on the team were more likely to make progress.
“For example, several studies identified that campuses with stronger institutional research offices that included their institutional research representative on the team were more likely to make progress (Bensimon, 2012;Smith, 2020;Smith & Parker, 2005).”
From Moving Toward Institutional Culture Change in Higher Education: An Exploration into Cross-functional Professional Learning Communities (2025) · cites this paper as Smith, 2020
Team formation/composition is critical to inquiry teams' success; campuses that struggled to learn or move culture change forward did not have a representative cross-campus team.
“Team formation/composition is critical to their success and campuses that struggled to learn or move culture change forward did not have a representative crosscampus team (Kezar et al., 2008;Smith, 2020;Smith & Parker, 2005).”
From Moving Toward Institutional Culture Change in Higher Education: An Exploration into Cross-functional Professional Learning Communities (2025) · cites this paper as Smith, 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kezar, A., Hallett, R. E., Corwin, Z. B., & Hypolite, L. (2025) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-024-09753-1 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, D.
- Publisher
- Johns Hopkins University Press
- Published
- 2020
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
