Clinical presentation and management of patients with hyperadrenergic postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. A single center experience
Open accessAbstract
Background We present our single center experience of 27 patients of hyperadrenergic postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Methods In a retrospective analysis, we reviewed the charts of 300 POTS patients being followed at our autonomic center from 2003 to 2010, and found 27 patients eligible for inclusion in this study. POTS was defined as symptoms of orthostatic intolerance (of greater than six months' duration) accompanied by a heart rate increase of at least 30 bpm (or a rate that exceeds 120 bpm) that occurs in the first 10 min of upright posture or head up tilt test (HUTT) occurring in the absence of other chronic debilitating disorders. Patients were diagnosed as having the hyperadrenergic form based on an increase in their systolic blood pressure of ≥ 10 mm Hg during the HUTT (2) with concomitant tachycardia or their serum catecholamine levels (serum norepinephnrine level ≥ 600 pg/mL) upon standing. Results Twenty seven patients, aged 39 ± 11 years, 24, (89%) of them female and 22 (82%) Caucasian were included in this study. Most of these patients were refractory to most of the first and second line treatments, and all were on multiple combinations of medications. Conclusions Hyperadrenergic POTS should be identified and differentiated from neuropathic POTS. These patients are usually difficult to treat and there are no standardized treatment protocols known at this time for patients with hyperadrenergic POTS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An upright plasma NE ≥600 pg/mL is the criterion most often used to define hyperadrenergic POTS, and this threshold has been adapted in recent expert consensus statements.
“An upright plasma NE ≥600 pg/mL is the criterion most often used to define hyperadrenergic POTS,4–6 and this threshold has been adapted in recent expert consensus statements.7,8”
From Hyperadrenergic Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: Clinical Biomarkers and Response to Guanfacine (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 150 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Kanjwal, K., Saeed, B., Karabin, B., Kanjwal, Y., & Grubb, B. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Toledo Medical Center (US)
- University of Toledo (US)
- Venue
- Cardiology Journal
- Publisher
- VM Media SP. zo.o VM Group SK
- Published
- 2011-09-21
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 527-531
- ISSN
- 1897-5593 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127690269
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 150
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cardiology Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Keywords
- postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, orthostatic intolerance, head-up tilt, catecholamines, autonomic dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Blood Pressure, Diagnosis, Differential, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norepinephrine, Ohio, Posture, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Up-Regulation, Treatment Outcome, Tilt-Table Test, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Patient Positioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review