Cited by 16Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Is hospital admission valuable in managing syncope? Results from the STePS study

Open access
Costantino, Giorgio, Dipaola, Franca, Solbiati, Monica, Bulgheroni, Mara, Barbic, Franca, Furlan, Raffaello·2014·Cardiology Journal

Abstract

The proper way to test the usefulness of hospitalization in syncope patients would be to conduct a randomized controlled trial. However, this approach is characterized by major theoretical and ethical limitations which make this procedure unfeasible. Data from observational studies indirectly show that hospitalization might help reduce the short-term risk of death and adverse events by promptly identifying and treating life-threatening events or conditions. Future research should focus on identifying which patients will benefit from hospitalization. In this regard, we should be able both to correctly risk-stratify patients and to analyze syncope observation units and protocols, which may provide a safe alternative for the evaluation of intermediate-risk patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5603/cj.a2014.0071

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 16

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]2. Montori VM. Publication bias may explain the (lack of) review's findings. BMJ. N.p., 23-12-2003. Web. 28-8-2014. http://www. bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/30/publication-bias-may-expla- in-lack-reviews-findings.

Authors
Costantino, G., Dipaola, F., Solbiati, M., Bulgheroni, M., Barbic, F., & Furlan, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Fondazione Humanitas per la Ricerca (IT)
Venue
Cardiology Journal
Published
2014-12-18
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
606-610
ISSN
  • 1897-5593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1898-018X
OpenAlex
W2335374916
Cited by
16
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cardiology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Via Medica Journals (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
syncope, hospitalization, risk stratification, intermediate-risk patients, observational studies, randomized controlled trial limitations, adverse events
MeSH terms
Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Male, Patient Admission, Syncope, Disease Management, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review