Cited by 26Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Does reactive hypoglycemia during the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test adversely affect perinatal outcomes?

Open access
Delibas, Ilhan Bahri, Tanriverdi, Sema, Cakmak, Bulent·2018·Ginekologia Polska

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether pregnant women who have reactive hypoglycemia during the 100 g oral glucose toler-ance test (OGTT) are at an increased risk of poor pregnancy outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed perinatal data from 413 women who underwent a 3 h OGTT at 24-28 weeks of gestation and gave birth in our clinics between January 2012 and December 2014. RESULTS: According to OGTT results, the majority of the subjects were normoglycemic (n = 316, 76.5%), while 49 (11.9%) were diagnosed with gestational diabetes, and 33 (8.0%) had single high glucose values. Reactive hypoglycemia was de-tected in only 15 patients (3.6%). The mean age of the women in the reactive hypoglycemia group was significantly lower than that of the women in the gestational diabetes and single high glucose value groups (26.4 ± 4.4 years, 31.4 ± 5.4 years, and 31.8 ± 4.3 years, respectively; p < 0.05). The newborns of the women in the reactive hypoglycemia group had higher rates of APGAR scores < 7, increased admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and lower birth weights compared with the other groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: Reactive hypoglycemia during the 3 h 100 g OGTT is significantly associated with low APGAR scores, low birth weights, and prenatal admission to the NICU. Therefore, pregnant women who develop hypoglycemia during the 100 g OGTT performed at 24-28 weeks of gestation should receive attentive follow-up care to decrease the possibility of adverse perinatal outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5603/gp.a2018.0005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The exact definition of hypoglycemia is not uniform in the literature and varies according to glucose values (45-60 mg/dL) and accompanying symptoms.

    “The exact definition of hypoglycemia is not uniform in the literature and varies according to the glucose values (45–60 mg/dL) and accompanying symptoms [3,4].”

    From Hypoglycemia in Oral Glucose Tolerance Test during Pregnancy and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes—A Five-Year Cohort Study (2024) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Introduction says there is no precise glucose cut-off that predicts hypoglycemic symptoms and that reports use 45–50 mg/dL as indicative of reactive hypoglycemia. This supports variation in thresholds and the relevance of symptoms, but not the claimed upper value of 60 mg/dL. The Study groups section uses a 45 mg/dL cut-off; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies investigating the association between reactive hypoglycemia and pregnancy outcomes have conflicting results.

    “Previous studies investigated the association between reactive hypoglycemia and pregnancy outcomes with conflicting results [4,5,6,7].”
  • The prevalence of hypoglycemia during oGTT in pregnancy ranges between 3.6% and 11.3% in different reports.

    “Accordingly, the prevalence of hypoglycemia during oGTT in pregnancy ranges between 3.6% and 11.3% in different reports [4,5,6,7].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Serlin DC, Lash RW. Diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes mel- litus. Am Fam Physician. 2009; 80(1): 57-62, indexed in Pubmed: 19621846.
  2. Weissman A, Solt I, Zloczower M, et al. Hypoglycemia during the 100-g oral glucose tolerance test: incidence and perinatal signifi- cance. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105(6): 1424-1428, doi: 10.1097/01. AOG.0000159577.28448.f9, indexed in Pubmed: 15932839. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Pugh SK, Doherty DA, Magann EF, et al. Does hypoglycemia following a glucose challenge test identify a high risk pregnancy? Reprod Health. 2009; 6: 10, doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-6-10, indexed in Pubmed: 19602284. · DOI
  4. Martín-Timón I, Del Cañizo-Gómez FJ. Mechanisms of hypoglycemia una- wareness and implications in diabetic patients. World J Diabetes. 2015; 6(7): 912-926, doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i7.912, indexed in Pubmed: 26185599. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Palardy J, Havrankova J, Lepage R, et al. Blood glucose measurements during symptomatic episodes in patients with suspected postpran- dial hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med. 1989; 321(21): 1421-1425, doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911233212101, indexed in Pubmed: 2811957. · DOI
  6. Lefèbvre PJ, Andreani D, Marks V, et al. Statement on post-prandial or reactive hypoglycaemia. Diabet Med. 1988; 5(2): 200-440, indexed in Pubmed: 2964986.
  7. Field JB. Hypoglycemia. Definition, clinical presentations, classification, and laboratory tests. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1989; 18(1): 27-43, indexed in Pubmed: 2645129.
  8. Brun JF, Fedou C, Mercier J. Postprandial reactive hypoglycemia. Diabetes Metab. 2000; 26(5): 337-351, indexed in Pubmed: 11119013.
  9. Metzger BE, Coustan DR. Summary and recommendations of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. The Organizing Committee. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21 Suppl 2: B161-B167, indexed in Pubmed: 9704245.
  10. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Other Catego- ries of Glucose Intolerance. Diabetes. 1979; 28(12): 1039-1057, doi: 10.2337/diab.28.12.1039. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967; 71(2): 159-163, indexed in Pubmed: 6029463.
  12. Esakoff TF, Cheng YW, Sparks TN, et al. The association between bir- thweight 4000 g or greater and perinatal outcomes in patients with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200(6): 672.e1-672.e4, doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.035, indexed in Pubmed: 19376489. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Plasencia W, Garcia R, Pereira S, et al. Criteria for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011; 30(2): 108-115, doi: 10.1159/000324684, indexed in Pubmed: 21454960. · DOI
  14. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabe- tes--2009. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32 Suppl 1: S13-S61, doi: 10.2337/dc09- -S013, indexed in Pubmed: 19118286. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Rani PR, Begum J. Screening and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Where Do We Stand. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(4): QE01-QE04, doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17588.7689, indexed in Pubmed: 27190902. · DOI
  16. Roeckner JT, Sanchez-Ramos L, Jijon-Knupp R, et al. Single abnormal va- lue on 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test during pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215(3): 287-297, doi: 10.1016/j. ajog.2016.04.040, indexed in Pubmed: 27133007. · DOI
  17. Hernandez TL, Friedman JE, Van Pelt RE, et al. Patterns of glycemia in normal pregnancy: should the current therapeutic targets be challen- ged? Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(7): 1660-1668, doi: 10.2337/dc11-0241, indexed in Pubmed: 21709299. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Eik W, Marcon SS, Krupek T, et al. Blood levels of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines during an oral glucose tolerance test in patients with symptoms suggesting reactive hypoglycemia. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016; 49(8), doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20165195, indexed in Pubmed: 27409331. · DOI
  19. Langer O, Damus K, Maiman M, et al. A link between relative hypo- glycemia-hypoinsulinemia during oral glucose tolerance tests and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 155(4): 711-716, indexed in Pubmed: 3532796.
  20. Feinberg JH, Magann EF, Morrison JC, et al. Does maternal hypoglyce- mia during screening glucose assessment identify a pregnancy at-risk for adverse perinatal outcome? J Perinatol. 2005; 25(8): 509-513, doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211336, indexed in Pubmed: 15908987. · DOI
  21. Calfee EF, Rust OA, Bofill JA, et al. Maternal hypoglycemia: is it associa- ted with adverse perinatal outcome? J Perinatol. 1999; 19(5): 379-382, indexed in Pubmed: 10685261.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delibas, I. B., Tanriverdi, S., & Cakmak, B.
Venue
Ginekologia Polska
Published
2018-01-31
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
25-29
ISSN
  • 0017-0011 (ISSN-L)
  • 2543-6767
OpenAlex
W2786480046
Cited by
26
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Ginekologia Polska (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Via Medica Journals (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
reactive hypoglycemia, oral glucose tolerance test, perinatal outcomes, gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, neonatal intensive care admission, Apgar score, low birth weight, maternal age
MeSH terms
Adult, Apgar Score, Birth Weight, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review