The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Geocultural Aspects of the Security Policy of Contemporary Israel
Abstract
The article shows how the symbolism contained in the image of the Jewish state influenced, especially recently, the vectors of Israel’s security policy. Attention is paid to these aspects aimed at protecting national identity. The author tries to substantiate the influence of the cultural factor on Israel’s security policy. The research is based on historical analysis, source analysis, and descriptive narrative. The instruments and tools used by the state in the implementation of the aforementioned tasks are presented – from the basic laws and compatible legal acts regulating the social life of Israeli citizens to the policy of cultural and ethnic isolation and separation carried out by the armed forces. In the Middle East emphasizing one’s own individuality is a strategic goal, but the price of internal a conflicts can be high.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Zionism, which sees Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people with a right to selfdetermination based on religious and historical claims to the land, formed Israel's founding philosophy as it emerged from the trauma of diaspora and anti-Semitic persecution (Tarasiuk, 2021).”
From Theoretical Analysis of the Iran and Israel Conflict: Identity, Power, and Ideology (2025) · cites this paper as Tarasiuk, 2021
In the citing paper
“Israel's Basic Law upholds the notion that it is a “Jewish state,” placing Jewish identity at the centre of its security and national policies (Tarasiuk, 2021).”
From Theoretical Analysis of the Iran and Israel Conflict: Identity, Power, and Ideology (2025) · cites this paper as Tarasiuk, 2021
In the citing paper
“For Israel, Zionism and Jewish nationalism are equally important to its foreign policy.”
From Theoretical Analysis of the Iran and Israel Conflict: Identity, Power, and Ideology (2025) · cites this paper as Tarasiuk, 2021
In the citing paper
“Israel's identity, on the other hand, stems from its historical view of itself as a Jewish state.”
From Theoretical Analysis of the Iran and Israel Conflict: Identity, Power, and Ideology (2025) · cites this paper as Tarasiuk, 2021
Citations
Cited by
Theoretical Analysis of the Iran and Israel Conflict: Identity, Power, and Ideology
Siddiqi, M. U., & Windy Khairunnisa, B. (2025) · Journal of Islamic Civilization and Culture Review · doi:10.58524/jiccr.v1i1.21
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarasiuk, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Siedlce (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Tarasiuk, Renata
- ORCID
- Tarasiuk, Renata
- Venue
- Security Dimensions
- Publisher
- Index Copernicus
- Published
- 2021-07-19
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 138-154
- ISSN
- 2353-7000 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4206323127
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Security Dimensions (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Jewish Identity and Society
- Keywords
- Israeli security policy, national identity, military personnel, internal conflict, Middle East security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
