CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Explicit Teaching of Hedges: Bringing Hedging in Academic Writing into the Thai EFL Classroom (pp.

Petchkij, Worawanna·2019·Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching
DOI 10.56040/wyjc1617
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.56040/wyjc1617

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Alibabaee, A., & Shahzamani, M. (2013). Enhancing Iranian EFL learners' awareness of hedging through ex- plicit teaching, The Iranian EFL Journal, 9(3), 9-23.
  2. Alward, A. S., Mooi Ch. Ch., & Bidin, S. J. (2012). Hedges and boosters in the Yemeni EFL undergraduates' persuasive essay: An empirical study. The Internet Journal of Language, Culture and Society, 34, 1-12.
  3. Adams, B. Heaton & P. Howarth (Eds.), Socio-cultural issues in English for academic purposes (pp. 1-12). London: MacMillan Publishers.
  4. Chick, J. (1996). Intercultural communication. In S. McKay & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and lan- guage teaching (pp. 329-348). New York: Cambridge University.
  5. Clemen, G. (1997). The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. In R. Markkanen & H. Schroder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in aca- demic texts (pp. 235-248). Berlin: de Gruyter.
  6. Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse (pp. 118-136). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  7. Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in academic writing: some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 271-287.
  8. Darian, S. (1995). Hypotheses in introductory science texts. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 33(2), 83-108.
  9. Gilbert, P. (1991). Writing pedagogy: Personal voices, truth telling and "real" texts. In C. Baker & A. Luke (Eds.), Toward a critical sociology of reading pedagogy (pp. 27-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  10. Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 128-139.
  11. Hidayati, F., Muhammad, A., & Dallyono, R. (2008). The use of hedging in academic discourse. Educationists, 2(1), 27-37.
  12. Hinkel, E. (1997). Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 361-386.
  13. Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(4), 239-256.
  14. Hyland, K. (1996a). Nurturing hedges in the ESP curriculum. System, 24(4), 477-490.
  15. Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students' writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 183-205.
  16. Khamkhien, A. (2014). Linguistic features of evaluative stance: findings from research article discussions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 54-69.
  17. LoCastro, V. (1997). Pedagogical intervention and pragmatic competence development. Applied Language Learning, 8(1), 75-109.
  18. Martin-Martin, P. (2008). The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. Inter- national Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 133-152.
  19. Petchkij, W. (2016). Common lexical hedges and their functions in medical research articles on oncology: A comparative study of Thai and native writers of English. Journal of Letters, 1, 83-128.
  20. Petchkij, W., Ratsami, P., Furuhashi, Y., & Pinyarn, S. (2016). Forms and functions of lexical hedges in Thai research articles in the areas of sciences and humanities. Journal of Liberal Arts, 16(2), 173-198.
  21. Prasithrathsint, A. (2014). The two faces of academic writing: Explicitness and hedging in Thai academic writ- ing. In A. Prasithrathsint, (Ed.), Language and power (pp. 105-107). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.
  22. Prasithrathsint, A. (2015). Linguistic markers and stylistic attributes of hedging in English academic papers written by native and non-native speakers of English. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities Regular, 18(1), 11-22.
  23. Swales, J. M., & Feak, Ch. B. (2015). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3 rd ed.). USA: University of Michigan Press.
  24. Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21-42). New York: Oxford University.
  25. Sukhanindr, M. (2008). Hedging in research articles about English language teaching written by Thai and native speakers of English (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  26. Tran, Th. Q., & Duong, Th. M. (2013). Hedging: A comparative study of research article results and discussion section in applied linguistics and chemical engineering. English for Specific Purposes World, 41(14), 2-13.
  27. Vassileva, I. (1997). Hedging in English and Bulgarian academic writing. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 203-222). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  28. Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 83-103). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  29. Ventola, E. (1992). Writing scientific English: Overcoming cultural problems. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 191-220.
  30. Ventola, E. (1997). Probability: The exploration to its role in academic writing. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles in academic writing. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  31. Wishnoff, J. R. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners' acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computed-mediated discourse. Second Language Studies, 19(1), 119-148.
  32. Yang, Y. (2013). Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese sci- entific discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 50, 23-36.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Petchkij, W.
Venue
Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching
Publisher
e-FLT (Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching)
Published
2019-06
Volume
16
Issue
1
ISSN
0219-9874
DOI
10.56040/wyjc1617
Cited by
5
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review