Differences in Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with and without Vascular Complications
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a metabolic disease that causes microvascular and macrovascular complications and increases mortality. Oxidative stress and inflammation play a role in the pathogenesis of (T2DM). Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) levels as oxidative stress and inflammation markers help detect the high risk of developing T2DM complications. Objectives: Analyzing the differences in GGT and hs-CRP levels between T2DM with and without vascular complications predicts the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of T2DM vascular complications. Methods: The cross-sectional study involved 19 patients with vascular complications of T2DM and 19 patients with T2DM without complications. Using patient serum samples, GGT and hs-CRP levels were measured using the TMS24i device. Results: The T2DM vascular complications group increased GGT and hs-CRP values. GGT and hs-CRP levels between T2DM with and without vascular complications were significant. The macrovascular (CHD) group had a higher GGT value than the microvascular group, there was a substantial difference in GGT between the two research subjects. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in hs-CRP. Logistic regression analysis found that the duration of T2DM and GGT influenced the risk of T2DM vascular complications. Analysis (ROC) showed GGT had (AUC=0.691) and hs-CRP (AUC=0.706). Conclusions: GGT plays a role in risk detection (CHD) compared to microvasculature. Significant differences in GGT and hs-CRP between T2DM with and without vascular complications and vascular complications of T2DM increase the values of GGT and hs-CRP
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12
- Authors
- Rahmah, N., Wardhani, P., Puspitasari, Y., & Adi Soelistijo, S.
- Affiliations
- Tecnológico de Antioquia (CO)
- Venue
- Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología
- Publisher
- A & G Editor
- Published
- 2024-12-30
- Volume
- 4
- ISSN
- 1851-3107 (ISSN-L)
- 2796-9711
- OpenAlex
- W4402144121
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Salud Ciencia y Tecnología (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, vascular complications, gamma-glutamyl transferase, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, oxidative stress, inflammation, macrovascular complications, coronary artery disease, microvascular complications, risk prediction, diabetes duration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review