The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New interpretations of alluvial and paleo-vegetation records from Chaco Canyon, New Mexico
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Between c. 100 BC and AD 1000, the valley bottom in Chaco was a relatively flat, seasonally wet flood plain.
“Between c. 100 BC and AD 1000, the valley bottom in Chaco was a relatively flat, seasonally wet flood plain (Hall 2010: 236).”
From The complex history of Pueblo Bonito and its interpretation (2018) · cites this paper as Hall 2010: 236
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The complex history of Pueblo Bonito and its interpretation
Crown, P. L., & Wills, W. H. (2018) · Antiquity · doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.138 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, S. A.
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Stephen A.
- Venue
- Geology of the Four Corners Country
- Publisher
- New Mexico Geological Society
- Published
- 2010
- Pages
- 231-245
- OpenAlex
- W4293580745
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- paleovegetation, Chaco Canyon, paleoclimate, paleoecology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
