Midfacial and Dental Changes Associated with Nasal Positive Airway Pressure in Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Craniofacial Conditions
Open accessAbstract
Study objectives Nasal positive airway pressure (nPAP) for treatment of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a widespread therapy that currently lacks longitudinal data describing how mask pressure impacts the developing facial skeleton. This retrospective cohort study compared midfacial growth in pediatric patients with underlying craniofacial conditions diagnosed with OSA who were compliant vs. noncompliant with nPAP therapy, and explored correlations between demographic, medical, and sleep variables with annual rate of facial change.Methods Records from Seattle Children's Hospital's Craniofacial Center and Sleep Disorders Center were reviewed to identify patients prescribed nPAP for OSA with serial cephalographic images obtained during routine clinical care for concomitant craniofacial diagnosis. Lateral cephalometric analysis was used to determine mean annual change in midfacial structures from T1 (pre-nPAP) to T2 (post-nPAP) in compliant vs. noncompliant subjects. Compliance was indicated by nPAP usage of > 20 h/week for > 6 months.Results 50 subjects were compliant with nPAP therapy (mean age 10.42 years) for an average of 2.57 years, and 50 subjects were noncompliant (mean age 8.53 years). Compliant subjects experienced negative mean annual change (retrusion) of the midface compared to forward growth seen in noncompliant subjects (SNA: -0.57° vs. 0.56°), counterclockwise rotation of palatal plane (SN-PP: -1.15° vs. 0.09°), and upper incisor flaring (U1-SN: 2.41° vs. -0.51°).Conclusions Pressure to the midface from compliant nPAP use may alter normal facial growth. Cephalometric findings indicate a greater need for collaboration between sleep medicine physicians and orthodontists to monitor midfacial growth during nPAP treatment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Continuous positive airway pressure is considered the first-line treatment in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea without adenotonsillar hypertrophy, although with low tolerance of 25% to 50% and risk of craniofacial sequels after long-term use.
“Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered the first-line treatment in pediatric OSA without adenotonsillar hypertrophy, although with low tolerance (25% to 50%) 11 12 13 and risk of craniofacial sequels after long-term use. 14 15”
From Mandibular Advancement Appliances in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Umbrella Review (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
Evidence-based guidelines support continuous positive airway pressure treatment as an effective first-line treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children without adenotonsillar hypertrophy, but it is complicated by low tolerance or high refusal (25%-50%).
“Evidence-based guidelines support the use of continuous positive airway pressure treatment (CPAP) as an effective first-line treatment of OSA in children without adenotonsillar hypertrophy; however, this is complicated by low tolerance or high refusal level of treatment (25%–50%).”
From Effectiveness of functional orthodontic appliances in obstructive sleep apnea treatment in children: literature review (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 89
- Authors
- Roberts, S. D., Kapadia, H., Greenlee, G., & Chen, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Chen, Maida L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
- Published
- 2016-04-15
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 469-475
- ISSN
- 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9397
- PMC
- PMC4795272
- OpenAlex
- W2200679335
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Washington
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- pediatric obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP adherence, midfacial growth, craniofacial conditions, SNA angle
- MeSH terms
- Cephalometry, Child, Facial Bones, Female, Humans, Male, Masks, Maxillofacial Development, Mouth, Nasal Cavity, Patient Compliance, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review