A single arm pilot trial of brief cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in adolescents with physical and psychiatric comorbidities
Open accessAbstract
Study objectives The majority of adolescents with chronic insomnia have physical health or psychiatric comorbidities; insomnia is also associated with greater negative daytime symptoms (e.g., depressive symptoms) and reduced overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, to date, there has been limited attention to treatment of insomnia in this population. The purpose of this study was to determine the preliminary efficacy of a brief cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) intervention on sleep, psychological symptoms, and HRQOL outcomes in adolescents with insomnia and co-occurring physical or psychiatric comorbidities.Methods We conducted a single arm pilot trial in which 40 youth (mean age = 14.93, standard deviation = 1.89) with insomnia and physical or psychiatric comorbidities (e.g., depression, chronic pain, anxiety, gastrointestinal problems) received CBT-I in four individual treatment sessions over 4 to 6 w. Adolescents completed 7 days of wrist actigraphy and self-report measures of insomnia, sleep quality and behaviors, psychological symptoms, and HRQOL outcomes at pretreatment, immediate posttreatment, and 3-mo follow-up.Results CBT-I was associated with improvements in self-reported measures of sleep including insomnia symptoms, sleep quality, sleep hygiene, pre-sleep arousal, and sleep onset latency. Psychological symptoms and HRQOL also improved. Effects were generally sustained at 3-mo follow-up.Conclusions CBT-I may be efficacious for adolescents with co-occurring physical and mental health comorbidities; future randomized controlled trials are needed to test the effect of CBT-I on sleep, psychological symptoms, and HRQOL and to evaluate maintenance of treatment effects over longer time periods.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CBT-I has been found to be effective for adolescents with co-occurring physical and psychological conditions, including adolescents with chronic pain.
“Specifically, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) has been found to be effective for adolescents with co-occurring physical and psychological conditions, including adolescents with chronic pain [40].”
From Best-evidence for the rehabilitation of chronic pain part 1: Pediatric pain (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
The Abstract reports improvements after CBT-I in a pilot sample with physical or psychiatric comorbidities, including chronic pain. But its conclusion says CBT-I “may be efficacious,” and the Discussion calls for randomized trials to test efficacy more rigorously. The paper does not establish effectiveness specifically for the adolescents with chronic pain in its sample. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPsychological interventions are effective at addressing sleep problems.
“There is evidence to suggest psychological interventions are effective at addressing sleep problems.”
From Best-evidence for the rehabilitation of chronic pain part 1: Pediatric pain (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
Outcomes from the pilot trial demonstrated improvements in insomnia, sleep quality, sleep hygiene, psychological symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life.
“Outcomes from the pilot trial demonstrated improvements in insomnia, as well as improvements in sleep quality and sleep hygiene, psychological symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life [40].”
From Best-evidence for the rehabilitation of chronic pain part 1: Pediatric pain (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Palermo, T. M., Beals-Erickson, S., Bromberg, M., Law, E., & Chen, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Palermo, Tonya M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
- Published
- 2017-03-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 401-410
- ISSN
- 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9397
- PMC
- PMC5337587
- OpenAlex
- W2754359215
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Seattle Children's Research Institute
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, adolescent insomnia, chronic insomnia, psychiatric comorbidity, somatic comorbidity, health-related quality of life, sleep quality, sleep hygiene, sleep latency, pre-sleep arousal, depression, anxiety, chronic pain, gastrointestinal problems, brief psychotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Pilot Projects, Northwestern United States, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review