Adherence to Positive Airway Therapy After Switching From CPAP to ASV: A Big Data Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Study objectives There is a lack of data regarding adherence trajectories when switching from continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to adaptive servoventilation (ASV) in the context of persistent or treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (CSA). This study investigated 90-day adherence rates in patients with sleep apnea based on the type of positive airway pressure (PAP) device used and any switching of PAP modality over time.Methods Telemonitoring data were obtained from a United States PAP database. Eligible patients were a 30% random sample who started PAP, plus all who started ASV, from January 1, 2015 to October 2, 2015. All received PAP and had at least one session with usage of 1 hour or more. Adherence and device usage were determined in three groups: started on CPAP and stayed on CPAP (CPAP only); started on ASV and stayed on ASV (ASV only); started on CPAP, switched to ASV (Switch). The United States Medicare definition of adherence was used.Results The study included 198,890 patients; 189,724 (CPAP only), 8,957 (ASV only) and 209 (Switch). In the Switch group, average apnea-hypopnea index decreased significantly on ASV versus CPAP. At 90 days, adherence rates were 73.8% and 73.2% in the CPAP only and ASV only groups. In the Switch group, CPAP adherence was 62.7%, improving to 76.6% after the switch to ASV. Mean device usage at 90 days was 5.27, 5.31, and 5.73 h/d in the CPAP only, ASV only, and Switch groups, respectively.Conclusions Treatment-emergent or persistent CSA during CPAP reduced therapy adherence, but adherence improved early after switching from CPAP to ASV.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a limited body of literature supporting the use of adaptive servo-ventilation in cases of persistent treatment-emergent central sleep apnea.
“However, there is a limited body of literature to support its use in cases of persistent treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA).1047–1055”
From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1053]
ASV improved adherence when switching from CPAP in patients with presumed TECSA.
“ASV improved adherence when switching from CPAP in patients with presumed TECSA,1053”
From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1053]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Pépin, J.-L. D., Woehrle, H., Liu, D., Shao, S., Armitstead, J. P., Cistulli, P. A., Benjafield, A. V., & Malhotra, A.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- ResMed (Australia) (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- ResMed (United States) (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pépin, Jean-Louis D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
- Published
- 2018-01-15
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-63
- ISSN
- 1550-9389 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9397
- PMC
- PMC5734894
- OpenAlex
- W2783032176
- Semantic Scholar
- 82c461103be9ee91e4e1f012625303507a6e6449
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL134632, R01HL085188, K24HL132105)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- central sleep apnea, adaptive servo-ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure, positive airway pressure, medication adherence, treatment switching, remote patient monitoring, apnea-hypopnea index, device utilization
- MeSH terms
- Big Data, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Positive-Pressure Respiration, United States, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Central, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review