Positive Airway Pressure Initiation: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Therapy Mode and Titration Process on Efficacy, Adherence, and Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the efficacy of automatically adjusted positive airway pressure (APAP) with a comfort feature (A-Flex) at reducing apneas and hypopneas in participants with moderate to severe OSA. (2) To determine the relative difference between A-Flex, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and APAP-derived optimal pressure for CPAP (CPAP(APAP)) on adherence to treatment. (3) To determine the relative difference between APAP with A-Flex, CPAP, and CPAP(APAP) on long-term change in functional outcomes. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, 3-arm, multicenter trial. SETTING: University and Veterans Affairs medical centers. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: 168 participants were randomized, and 140 completed the 180-day study. INTERVENTIONS: (1) A-Flex; (2) CPAP; (3) APAP for 14 days and then switched to CPAP at a fixed pressure. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Apnea-hypopnea indices, average and minimum oxygen saturation, time spent < 90% were significantly poorer for A-Flex vs. CPAP at the initiation of study treatment; with the exception of minimum oxygen saturation, these differences were absent at 180 days. A-Flex had lower average leak values at both 3 and 6 months. There were no significant differences between groups in major efficacy, adherence, and outcome (subjective sleepiness, objective vigilance, blood pressure, quality of life) measures. No differences between groups in attitudes toward use were observed at 3 or 6 months; participant ratings for CPAP were significantly higher than A-Flex on treatment satisfaction and benefit, but not different for sleep quality and mask comfort. CONCLUSIONS: We found that A-Flex shows equivalency, but non-superiority (except for average leak values), in efficacy, adherence, and functional outcomes compared to CPAP after either 3 or 6 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: Positive Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00636181.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A meta-analysis of 5 RCTs demonstrated no clinically significant difference in self-reported sleepiness between participants on modified pressure profile PAP compared to standard PAP.
“A meta-analysis of 5 RCTs 188,236-239 demonstrated no clinically significant difference in self-reported sleepiness between participants on modified pressure profile PAP compared to standard PAP (see supplemental material, Figure S86).”
Only 3 RCTs reported data on side effects for modified pressure profile PAP.
“Only 3 RCTs reported data on side effects.188,239,241”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Kushida, C. A., Berry, R. B., Blau, A., Crabtree, T. R., Fietze, I., Kryger, M. H., Kuna, S. T., Pegram, G. V., & Penzel, T.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Gaylord Hospital (US)
- Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clete A. Kushida
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-08-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1083-92
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- PMC
- PMC3138163
- OpenAlex
- W2075145952
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- SLEEP (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- obstructive sleep apnea, automatic positive airway pressure, continuous positive airway pressure, CPAP titration, CPAP initiation, medication adherence, apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen saturation, air leakage, treatment satisfaction, mask comfort, sleep quality, sustained attention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review