Race and Residential Socioeconomics as Predictors of CPAP Adherence
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: There are few established predictors of CPAP adherence; poor adherence limits its effectiveness. We investigated whether race, education level, and residential economic status predict CPAP adherence in participants enrolled in a trial with standard access to treatment. DESIGN: A multi-center randomized trial of home vs. lab-based evaluation and treatment of OSA assessing adherence to CPAP at 1 and 3 months. SETTING: Seven AASM-accredited sleep centers in 5 U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with moderate to severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15 and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score > 12) who completed follow-up at 1 and/or 3 months (n = 135). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Subjects' demographic data were collected upon enrollment; CPAP use at 1 and 3 months was assessed at clinic follow-up. In unadjusted analyses, CPAP adherence (average minutes per night of CPAP use) at 3 months was lower in black subjects and in subjects from lower socioeconomic status ZIP codes. In adjusted analyses using multivariate linear regression, black race was predictive of CPAP adherence at one month (P = 0.03). At 3 months, black race was predictive in analyses only when ZIP code SES was not adjusted for. CONCLUSION: Black race and lower socioeconomic residential areas are associated with poorer adherence to CPAP in subjects with standardized access to care and treatment. Disparities remain despite provision of standardized care in a clinical trial setting. Future research is needed to identify barriers to adherence and to develop interventions tailored to improve CPAP adherence in at risk populations. Portable Monitoring for Diagnosis and Management of Sleep Apnea (HomePAP) CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NIH CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NUMBER: NCT00642486. URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00642486.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CPAP adherence is influenced by race, with reduced adherence reported in Black, Hispanic, and Asian Pacific Islander users compared to white users.
“CPAP adherence is also influenced by race, with reduced adherence reported in Black, Hispanic, and Asian Pacific Islander users compared to white users.1108–1112”
From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1109]
The Discussion reports lower CPAP use among Black than white participants. Table 4 shows no significant difference for Hispanic participants compared with white non-Hispanic participants, and our copy provides no Asian Pacific Islander comparison. This source therefore supports only the Black–white portion of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 190
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [32]32. Young T, Shahar E, Nieto FJ, et al. Predictors of sleep-disordered breath- ing in community-dwelling adults: the Sleep Heart Health Study. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:893-900.
- Authors
- Billings, M. E., Auckley, D., Benca, R., Foldvary-Schaefer, N., Iber, C., Redline, S., Rosen, C. L., Zee, P., & Kapur, V. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- MetroHealth Medical Center (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Billings, Martha E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1653-1658
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- PMC
- PMC3208842
- OpenAlex
- W2053751269
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- SLEEP (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Research and Development
- Health Services Research and Development
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Keywords
- CPAP adherence, obstructive sleep apnea, race, racial disparities, socioeconomic status, Black patients, educational attainment, barriers to adherence
- MeSH terms
- Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Black People, White People, Racial Groups, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review