The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Tongue Fat Infiltration in Obese Versus Lean Zucker Rats
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obesity is the most important risk factor for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and the effects of obesity may be mediated by tongue fat. Our objective was to examine the effects of obesity on upper airway structures in obese (OBZ) and non-obese (NBZ) Zucker rats. DESIGN: Animal study. SETTING: Academic Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: OBZ (638.2 ± 39 g; 14.9 ± 1.1 w) and age-matched NBZ Zucker (442.6 ± 37 g, 15.1 ± 1.5 w) rats. INTERVENTIONS: TONGUE FAT AND VOLUME AND WERE ASSESSED USING: in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), magnetic resonance imaging including Dixon imaging for tongue fat volume, ex vivo biochemistry (fat quantification; triglyceride (mg)/tissue (g), and histology (Oil Red O stain). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: MRS: overall OBZ tongue fat/water ratio was 2.9 times greater than NBZ (P < 0.002) with the anterior OBZ tongue up to 3.3 times greater than NBZ (P < 0.002). Biochemistry: Triglyceride (TG) in the tongue was 4.4 times greater in OBZ versus NBZ (P < 0.0006). TG was greater in OBZ tongue (3.57 ± 1.7 mg/g) than OBZ masseter muscle (0.28 ± 0.1; P < 0.0001) but tongue and masseter TG were not different in NBZ rats (0.82 ± 0.3 versus 0.28 ± 0.1 mg/g, P = 0.67). Dixon fat volume was significantly increased in OBZ (56 ± 15 mm3) versus NBZ (34 ± 5 mm3, P < 0.004). Histology demonstrated a greater degree of intracellular muscle fat and extramuscular fat infiltration in OBZ versus NBZ rats. CONCLUSIONS: Genetically obese rats had a large degree of fat infiltration in the tongue compared to both skeletal muscle and tongue tissues of the non-obese age-matched littermates. The significant fat increase and sequestration in the obese tongue may play a role in altered tongue neuromuscular function, tongue stiffness or metabolic function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among obese rats, there is greater deposition of fat within the tongue compared to non-obese rats.
“Brennick et al. showed that among obese rats, there was greater deposition of fat within the tongue compared to non-obese rats.342”
From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [342]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Shinde, 2013, Fat infiltration in the tongue of obese versus lean Zucker rats, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 187, A5470
- Magalang, 2002, Effects of hypoglossal nerve stimulation on upper airway mechanics in obese Zucker rats, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 165, A798
- Magalang, 2000, Obese Zucker rats have narrower upper airway compared to lean litter-mates [abstract], Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 161, A87
Metadata
- Authors
- Brennick, M. J., Delikatny, J., Pack, A. I., Pickup, S., Shinde, S., Zhu, J.-X., Roscoe, I., Kim, D. Y., Buxbaum, L. U., Cater, J. R., & Schwab, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Center for Sleep and Circadian Neurobiology
- Department of Radiology
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Biomedical Statistical Consulting, Maple Shade, NJ
- Corresponding author
- Schwab, Richard J.
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-06-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1095-1102
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- PMC
- PMC4015383
- OpenAlex
- W2036950886
- Semantic Scholar
- 945f59aad14dd53c698d7648d03110fa70946196
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- SLEEP (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Keywords
- obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, Zucker rats, triglycerides, intramuscular fat, upper airway, masseter muscle, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Dixon MRI, Oil Red O staining, neuromuscular function, genetic obesity model
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Animals, Lipids, Male, Masseter Muscle, Obesity, Rats, Zucker, Respiratory System, Thinness, Tongue, Water, Case-Control Studies, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Adiposity, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review