The Combination of Supplemental Oxygen and a Hypnotic Markedly Improves Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with a Mild to Moderate Upper Airway Collapsibility
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) results from the interaction of several physiological traits; specifically a compromised upper airway anatomy and muscle function, and two key non-anatomical deficits: elevated loop gain and a low arousal threshold. Although continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is an efficacious treatment, it is often poorly tolerated. An alternative approach could involve administering therapies targeting the non-anatomic causes. However, therapies (oxygen or hypnotics) targeting these traits in isolation typically improve, but rarely resolve OSA. Therefore, our aim was to determine how the combination of oxygen and eszopiclone alters the phenotypic traits and OSA severity and to assess the baseline phenotypic characteristics of responders/nonresponders to combination therapy. METHODS: In a single-blinded randomized crossover study, 20 OSA patients received combination therapy (3 mg eszopiclone and 40% oxygen) versus placebo/sham air, with 1 w between conditions. Under each condition, we assessed the effects on OSA severity (clinical polysomnography) and the phenotypic traits causing OSA using CPAP manipulations (research polysomnography). RESULTS: Combination therapy reduced the apnea-hypopnea index (51.9 ± 6.2 vs. 29.5 ± 5.3 events/h; P < 0.001), lowered both the ventilation associated with arousal (5.7 ± 0.3 vs. 5.2 ± 0.3 L/min; P = 0.05) and loop gain (3.3 ± 0.5 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3; P = 0.025). Responders to therapy (apnea-hypopnea index reduced by > 50% to below 15 events/h; n = 9/20) had less severe OSA (P = 0.001), a less collapsible upper airway (P = 0.01) and greater upper airway muscle effectiveness (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lowering loop gain and raising the arousal threshold is an effective therapy in patients whose anatomy is not severely compromised. Our work demonstrates that combining therapies that target multiple traits can resolve OSA in selected individuals. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT01633827.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Combinations of therapy may be required to eliminate apnea when using arousal-threshold manipulation.
“Consequently, combinations of therapy may well be required to eliminate apnea using this approach.”
From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [415]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 125
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [11]11. Engelman H, Wild MR. Improving CPAP use by patients with the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (SAHS). Sleep Med Rev 2003;71:81-99.
- [33]33. Kribbs NB, Pack AI, Kline LR, et al. Objective measurement of patterns of nasal CPAP use by patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:887-95.
- Authors
- Edwards, B. A., Sands, S. A., Owens, R. L., Eckert, D. J., Landry, S., White, D. P., Malhotra, A., & Wellman, A.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Edwards, Bradley A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-11-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1973-1983
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- PMC
- PMC5070751
- OpenAlex
- W2541319672
- Semantic Scholar
- 44cbebba758234bc7abea0dc4fe374e97a520e9b
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- SLEEP (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- American Heart Association (15SDG25890059)
- Pfizer
- Harvard Catalyst (UL1-RR025758)
- National Institutes of Health
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1035115, 1053201, 1049814)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL134632, P01HL095491, R01HL085188, K24HL132105, R01HL102321)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025758)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Keywords
- obstructive sleep apnea, supplemental oxygen, eszopiclone, hypnotics, upper airway collapsibility, loop gain, arousal threshold, combination therapy, CPAP tolerance, apnea-hypopnea index, predictors of treatment response, polysomnography
- MeSH terms
- Eszopiclone, Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Severity of Illness Index, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Cross-Over Studies, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review